Check and release linked purls about vt-arclight

[laurensorensen]

All right, so I didn't realize before that there were two sections of documents, one section that was dark and another that was released.
I am going to go back and re-assign item druids to the documents starting tomorrow. Could be a 2-3 day project.

Here are the "Dark" unreleased druids:
https://argo.stanford.edu/report?f%5Bis_governed_by_ssim%5D%5B%5D=info%3Afedora%2Fdruid%3Ayc562gm1634&f%5Brights_descriptions_ssim%5D%5B%5D=dark

Here are the released druids that we should be using for NTA Arclight:
https://argo.stanford.edu/report?f%5Bcontent_type_ssim%5D%5B%5D=book&f%5Bis_governed_by_ssim%5D%5B%5D=info%3Afedora%2Fdruid%3Ayc562gm1634&f%5Brights_descriptions_ssim%5D%5B%5D=world

Heads up @marlo-longley I'll be re-importing items from "Document books" sheet to ASpace once this is done. Will also add edm:type at this time too.

[laurensorensen]

Hannah says "The PDFs that the ICJ provided to us were accessioned as dark, preservation only. We made this decision because we produced our own PDFs as part of the OCR process during SDR accessioning. Our PDFs are better than the ones they produced."

Lauren: Oh, ok! Is that for all the documents or a majority? I have to associate druids with the descriptive metadata in ASpace so looking to match them up

Hannah Frost:
3:48 PM
I believe it is all, but can't swear to that. Here is the Argo link to all PDFs that are dark and therefore should not be linked to any record that would be released to ArcLight for public access
3:48
https://argo.stanford.edu/catalog?f%5Bis_governed_by_ssim%5D%5B%5D=info%3Afedora%2Fdruid%3Ayc562gm1634&f%5Brights_descriptions_ssim%5D%5B%5D=dark

[laurensorensen]

I am going to follow up with Geoff who did all the accessioning and add to this ticket further

[laurensorensen]

Re-import is finished for Document books. Heads up there are some fields (Like alternate title) which have no data in them for Document books Series but WILL have data existing in other Series' uploads.