Rethink setSize and setLocalSize about tapspace

[axelpale]

Proposition:

• setSize(IScalar width, IScalar height)
• setSize(number width, number height)
• IScalar getWidth()
• IScalar getHeight()

[axelpale]

Another proposition:

• setSize(IRectangle rect)
• setSize(Rectangle rect)
• setSize(number width, number height)
• IRectangle getSize()

[axelpale]

For reference, current size API:

• Vector getLocalSize()
• IVector getSize()
• setLocalSize(Vector diag)
• setSize(IVector diag)

Also, consider symmetry with transform API of AbstractPlane:

• Transform getGlobalTransform()
• ITransform getGlobalITransform()
• Transform getLocalTransform()
• ITransform getLocalITransform()
• setGlobalTransform(Transform tr)
• setGlobalITransform(ITransform itr)
• setLocalTransform(Transform tr)
• setLocalITransform(ITransform itr)

[axelpale]

Maybe:

• Size getGlobalSize()
• ISize getGlobalISize()
• Size getLocalSize()
• ISize getLocalISize()
• setGlobalSize(Size sz)
• setGlobalISize(ISize isz)
• setLocalSize(Size sz)
• setLocalISize(ISize isz)

Seems bloated but it is most unambiguous and symmetrical among the alternatives.

[axelpale]

The Size and Transform are different: where global and local ITransform represent different transforms in plane-invariant manner, global and local Size represent the same size on different planes. Therefore semantically better set of methods is:

• Size getSize
• ISize getISize
• setSize(Size sz) and setSize(width, height)
• setISize(ISize sz)

[axelpale]

This suggestion became the final in taaspace v5.0.0