Add a second parameter to indicate is-resolved for each member of the array about proposal-promise-allsettled

[rpamely]

It's not clear to my why you prefer this over the current proposal. You can derive an array of status in the existing proposal if you need.

With your suggestion you will need to iterate over two arrays in sync to read the value and status. This is not great in my opinion.

[phistuck]

This is just a suggestion for a feature, not a concrete proposal that it should be written exactly this way.

What if there is no value either way? You cannot infer the result in that case (I know it may sound like an an API/bad practice issue to you).

[rpamely]

Sorry, I actually misunderstood you were suggesting the first parameter stay unchanged.

The first parameter currently is an array of objects. These objects contain the status. What is unsuitable about this for analytics or logging? You could easily results.map(r => r.status) to get the array you want for the second parameter? Unless I am missing something again?

[phistuck]

I think I missed that, for some reason. Closing this.