Decentralizing repositories about web-frameworks

[OvermindDL1]

Maybe, but honestly I'm unsure what that might actually gain in this case?

[waghanza]

it facilitate maintaining ... assuming we can use some services to help us doing this stuff

• coveralls, or else
• travis, or else
• best practices badges ...

[OvermindDL1]

If built well it could also be easy to setup a new test by just telling the benchmarker about a new git url as well... That could be a useful gain...

[waghanza]

In fact, we have two places where listing frameworks :

• benchmarker
• neph

It could be accurate to decentralize repo + have one list that our internal tool that emit a neph configuration file

[tbrand]

I don't like it, sorry. 😢
Bacause jumping between many the repositories waste my time absolutly...

[waghanza]

oh, I think it's just a matter of tool ;-)
for me decentralizing is not have to do when maintaining a very little number of projects (4-5 or so)
but with 34 it could help, and we can add CI / coverage / badges, and that helps in maintainability

of course, it more complicated than centralization, but I can maintain ruby / crystal / python / node / php, if you want ;-)