I see that the /initramfs/static/busybox file is the "normal" busybox. Wouldn't it be better to replace it with busybox-static which is better than the one mentioned above? about linux-live

[Tomas-M]

Why do you think so? It is statically compiled

[seba1452021]

I think it is "normal" since its list of utilities is not far from the conventional.

busybox-static in debian derivatives refers to the fact that it also has utilities to install and modify, such as creating .deb packages, these being the main things to note.

It has been very useful to me when I have had problems with the system... It also has blkid.

I know little English, I don't have ease with languages. I've managed with the Google translator and Deepl... I'm commenting this to avoid misunderstandings, I'm not looking to offend and etc.