The Layoutmanager ignores visibility attributes about superslim

[TonicArtos]

Yes, this is something I haven't looked into. With the exception of actually supporting this, the only real issue I see is GONE status in the grid layout. At present the item position is used to place views into the correct column, for this GONE would functional nearly identical to INVISIBLE.

[GoodSir42]

Indeed you might have to have a virtual index of the view that is not incremented if a view is gone instead of invisible.

Or you might do the following:
If it's a header it's counted as a view, but not rendered
if it's a normal view it's ignored and the layout manager continues with the next item.

[TonicArtos]

Basically, it would make positioning in the grid layout far more complex if you want to avoid scanning back to the beginning of the section every time you want to start positioning views. Anyway, I will get in support for visibility status eventually, though it might come in stages.

Thank you for reporting the issue :)

[GoodSir42]

Perhaps have a look at what google does in their implementation. The source of the layoutmanagers should be public.

[TonicArtos]

You'll be happy to know that View.GONE is not honoured for Google's implementations either.

In v0.4.0, SuperSLiM has the same view visibility behaviour. View.VISIBLE and View.INVISIBLE are adhered to, GONE is ignored.