Allow Sensu health checks defined as PowerShell scripts about consul-deployment-agent

[jeanml]

Documenting a few options discussed on Slack:

1. Not supporting PowerShell scripts at all, i.e. wrap up the execution in a Windows batch file that is natively supported by Sensu [This is currently the workaround I am using]
2. Write some kind of twisted logic in the deployment agent to check whether a script is a PowerShell script and add powershell.exe -NonInteractive -NoProfile -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -file (or something along those lines) to the command when creating the check definition.
3. Add an extra property, say script_type in healthchecks.yml, where values can be bash or powershell or windows-cmd and use that to figure out if the check definition's command requires the command prefix mentioned in 2)
4. By convention, only support PowerShell scripts on Windows, and use the platform property set during deployments (https://github.com/trainline/consul-deployment-agent/blob/master/agent/deployment.py#L25) to figure out what to do. if linux, do nothing. if windows, add the command prefix mentioned above. If the script isn't a PowerShell script, checks are likely to fail and create enough noise that development teams will be able to fix their issue and comply with the convention.
5. Stop messing about too much with Sensu check definitions in the deployment agent and let us specify the actual command in healthchecks.yml. This is at the expense of not checking if the script you are trying to run exists or not. Like in 4), should the script to execute not being there, it should create enough noise for development teams to fix.

[jeanml]

My personal opinion is that we should go for options 4 or 5.

Option 4:

• We are already enforcing the use of PowerShell scripts for lifecycle hook scripts (https://github.com/trainline/consul-deployment-agent/blob/master/agent/deployment_stages/common.py#L30-L33). if not, number 5).
• Most will agree that PowerShell is a great (if not the best/only) default for scripting on Windows.
• Allows development teams to not have to hard code location of Sensu plugins
• Con: Separating out script from its arguments in healthchecks.yml is perhaps not the greatest and adds a bit of complexity in the deployment agent
• Con: Some magic is happening in deployment agent to form a valid check command. What if the a check requires a different execution policy or different PowerShell options?

Option 5:

• WYSIWYG: check command is entirely under development team's control
• Con: Need to hardcode location of Sensu plugins, unless available as an environment variable for example.
• Con: No check the check command script is found on disk

Also, I have a slight concern about supporting PowerShell only, as some of the Sensu Windows plugins are Ruby scripts (https://github.com/sensu-plugins/sensu-plugins-windows). That being said, there seem to be a PowerShell equivalent available as well. My other concern is using other Sensu plugins, e.g. https://github.com/sensu-plugins/sensu-plugins-aws, written in Ruby. However, it looks like all of them need to run on Linux machines so there might not be any need to support Ruby plugins on Windows, unless we port them to PowerShell if need be.