Clarification about the maintenance dates for LTS versions about release

[stof]

then I suggest that these dates are removed an replaced by TBD. Having an official repo showing inaccurate release schedules is worse than showing that the dates are not defined IMO.

[XhmikosR]

Sorry, we got out of track. Our plan is to keep v4 support for a long time, at least for 2 years after v5 is out.

At this point, I too wonder if we should just nuke this repo since we don't have any kind of automation for it.

[jee-mj]

needs an update as v4 is EOL now, and v5 has no information regarding.

[cavias]

I don't think the dates in this repo are accurate in any way. Even the blog still announces a v4.5.1 release to fix a couple of regressions and continue to bridge the gap between v4 and v5, even though 4's supposed to be in "critical fixes only" maintenance LTS.

Safe to say the info in this repo is inaccurate. Although ending support for 4 without 5 being released (or within a month of it) would be absolutely hilarious.

It does make me wonder; what's the point of this repo if nobody is bothered to do anything with it?

[kjeyakanthan]

Hi. Has there been any change to the support of v4? it looks like its going out of support in November this year.