References not correct for nested lists with equal key names about yang-lsp

[svenefftinge]

Maybe you could help me interpreting the spec:
The section about the key statement states

Each such leaf identifier MUST refer to a child leaf of the list. The leafs can be defined directly in substatements to the list or in groupings used in the list.

I understood that any leaf that is a child of a list would be a candidate, but your example seems to suggest that only single elements can be ids (which makes semantically sense, of course).
So should I change the linking such that it doesn't look into substatements of nested lists?

[andreasjakobik]

My interpretation is that the leaf(s) identified by the key statement must be defined directly in the list (or in the top level of a used grouping). So yes, the linking should not look into the substatements.

[svenefftinge]

Thanks, I can confirm those semantics using pyang.