LaTeX .sty files missing about liquidhaskell-tutorial

[ranjitjhala]

Can you name some of them? there should be one -- like 'texlive-extras' or
some such...

but maybe its easier just to read the HTML version for now? (could be
easier to fix this problem in person?)

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Chris Tetreault [email protected]
wrote:

When building the book, various .sty files are missing. I've been
downloading them one-by-one until make stops failing, but I've downloaded
11 so far, and there is no end in sight.

Is there a list of LaTeX packages required for the book to build? Is there
some sort of combined package or distribution that I can download that has
all the dependencies? Failing that, can we get the .sty files added to
the repository (barring licensing issues), so that we can just call make
and have it work?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#16.

Ranjit.

[christetreault]

I was working on adding a "building the book" section to the readme. I figure it would be good to have in there since we've had so many discussions about it already.

Additionally, the .pdf is in the repo. But if I'm going to make formatting changes and such, I'd like to be able to build the updates and make sure everything looks right.

The following files are the ones I got through before I got fed up:

• xifthen.sty
• imftarg.sty
• titlesec.sty
• titletoc.sty
• chngpage.sty
• paralist.sty
• optparams.sty
• placeins.sty
• comment.sty
• thmtools.sty
• thmpatch.sty

If it's just a texlive addon that has this stuff I'll see if I can't figure out which one. CTAN kept claiming that these were in texlive.

[ranjitjhala]

Yes, look for texlive and maybe texlive-extras.

also don't install them one by one -- usually there is a gigantic ubuntu
package
with the lot (I think texlive or texlive extra or some such.)

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Chris Tetreault [email protected]
wrote:

I was working on adding a "building the book" section to the readme. I
figure it would be good to have in there since we've had so many
discussions about it already.

Additionally, the .pdf is in the repo. But if I'm going to make formatting
changes and such, I'd like to be able to build the updates and make sure
everything looks right.

The following files are the ones I got through before I got fed up:

• xifthen.sty
• imftarg.sty
• titlesec.sty
• titletoc.sty
• chngpage.sty
• paralist.sty
• optparams.sty
• placeins.sty
• comment.sty
• thmtools.sty
• thmpatch.sty

If it's just a texlive addon that has this stuff I'll see if I can't
figure out which one. CTAN kept claiming that these were in texlive.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#16 (comment)
.

Ranjit.

[ranjitjhala]

texlive-latex and texlive-latex extra.

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Ranjit Jhala [email protected] wrote:

Yes, look for texlive and maybe texlive-extras.

also don't install them one by one -- usually there is a gigantic ubuntu
package
with the lot (I think texlive or texlive extra or some such.)

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Chris Tetreault [email protected]
wrote:

I was working on adding a "building the book" section to the readme. I
figure it would be good to have in there since we've had so many
discussions about it already.

Additionally, the .pdf is in the repo. But if I'm going to make
formatting changes and such, I'd like to be able to build the updates and
make sure everything looks right.

The following files are the ones I got through before I got fed up:

• xifthen.sty
• imftarg.sty
• titlesec.sty
• titletoc.sty
• chngpage.sty
• paralist.sty
• optparams.sty
• placeins.sty
• comment.sty
• thmtools.sty
• thmpatch.sty

If it's just a texlive addon that has this stuff I'll see if I can't
figure out which one. CTAN kept claiming that these were in texlive.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#16 (comment)
.

Ranjit.

Ranjit.

[christetreault]

The following two packages seem to get me through the "missing .sty file" section:

• texlive-latex-extra
• texlive-fonts-extra

Now I'm getting an error:

! Undefined control sequence.
<recently read> \tightlist 

l.456 \tightlist

I feel like this might be something we'd need to work out in person. From looking at the Makefile (lines 1 and 2 in particular) I feel like the hidden dependency might be RanjitsLaptop.

This is certainly not an emergency though. I'll just assume my formatting changes don't look strange for the time being.

[ranjitjhala]

hmmm. wonder what thats about, can you see this:

rstudio/rmarkdown#439

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Chris Tetreault [email protected]
wrote:

The following two packages seem to get me through the "missing .sty file"
section:

• texlive-latex-extra
• texlive-fonts-extra

Now I'm getting an error:

! Undefined control sequence.
\tightlist

l.456 \tightlist

I feel like this might be something we'd need to work out in person. From
looking at the Makefile (lines 1 and 2 in particular) I feel like the
hidden dependency might be RanjitsLaptop.

This is certainly not an emergency though. I'll just assume my formatting
changes don't look strange for the time being.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#16 (comment)
.

Ranjit.

[ranjitjhala]

actually, looks like this is more relevant:

http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/257418/error-tightlist-converting-md-file-into-pdf-using-pandoc

sigh. latex & pandoc!

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Ranjit Jhala [email protected] wrote:

hmmm. wonder what thats about, can you see this:

rstudio/rmarkdown#439

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Chris Tetreault [email protected]
wrote:

The following two packages seem to get me through the "missing .sty file"
section:

• texlive-latex-extra
• texlive-fonts-extra

Now I'm getting an error:

! Undefined control sequence.
\tightlist

l.456 \tightlist

I feel like this might be something we'd need to work out in person. From
looking at the Makefile (lines 1 and 2 in particular) I feel like the
hidden dependency might be RanjitsLaptop.

This is certainly not an emergency though. I'll just assume my formatting
changes don't look strange for the time being.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#16 (comment)
.

Ranjit.

Ranjit.

[christetreault]

I made the change locally and it builds now. I can go ahead and submit a pull request for this.

[christetreault]

OK, pull request opened (#17). After it gets merged, I vote this issue gets closed.

[ranjitjhala]

Fixed by #17