Virtio-Net driver is not respecting VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF about kvm-guest-drivers-windows

[YanVugenfirer]

Related:

• #1089
• #1078

[YanVugenfirer]

I think this is an unfortunate remnant of the support for the pre-1.0 virtio spec.

[ybendito]

Probably was broken long time ago. Probably the driver should fail to start if this feature is not present until this is fixed. Thank you for pointing this out.

[YanVugenfirer]

@ddaney-fungible Out of curiosity - do you experience issues with the non-compliant driver on HW or other than QEMU\KVM hypervisor?

[ddaney-fungible]

@ddaney-fungible Out of curiosity - do you experience issues with the non-compliant driver on HW or other than QEMU\KVM hypervisor?

Yes. The failure was seen in a virtio-net function that is not part of Qemu. On the system in question EDK2 and Linux drivers seem to work well, but it was observed that this Windows driver was supplying buffers in two chunks, one of size 12 for the header and the second for the packet payload.

[ybendito]

@ddaney-fungible Can you please share with us the device features as suggested during feature negotiation? (better in hex)
Thanks.

[ddaney-fungible]

@ddaney-fungible Can you please share with us the host features as suggested during feature negotiation? (better in hex) Thanks.

device_feature[0] = 0x00010029
defice_feature[1] = 0x00000057

Driver is responding with:

driver_feature[0] = 0x00010029
driver_feature[1] = 0x00000007

[ybendito]

@ddaney-fungible
Just some notes to the feature set:
The device sets VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS(2) but this does not have any effect as the device does not have a control queue and does not indicate support for any guest offloads,
The device sets VIRTIO_NET_F_GSO(6) which does not have any effect as this bit is somehow may make sense only for legacy device
The features 4 and 48 are not defined in the spec and so ignored but in further editions of the spec they may designate something unexpected
All this, of course, is not related to the fact that the driver currently ignores VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF

[ddaney-fungible]

I think there is a misunderstanding of how to interpret those values.

device_feature[0] = VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM |
VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU |
VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC |
VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS

device_feature[1] = VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 |
VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA |
VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM |
VIRTIO_F_ORDER_PLATFORM |
VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED

[ybendito]

@ddaney-fungible Sorry, by mistake I swapped them when read