Comments (4)
Thank you for the link to the survey and for the valuable comments it contains. I note that it shows the responses of individual EO working group participants, but it does not appear to include a consensus position of the Education and Outreach Working Group regarding what changes are being requested. For instance, it isn't clear whether anyone (or EO as a group) is requesting that work on the current Note-track document be discontinued and that it be divided up for inclusion in other "resources" to be published elsewhere. Alternatively, is the suggestion that after it is published as a W3C Note, other resources should be updated to reflect its content?
Detailed comments on the draft are valuable and appreciated. The RQTF is preparing for publication of a revised working draft, and decisions will need to be made whether to delay publication to work on these comments. (A "heartbeat" draft is probably necessary though).
Also, the comments will need to be divided up into separate issues on GitHub - and it isn't clear whose task that will be.
The above views are my own; these comments are yet to be discussed by the TAsk Force.
from remote-meetings.
I would request that EO clarify its specific request as individual github issues, and do so against the forthcoming public working draft. As Jason notes, it's unclear what are EO consensus positions, and what individual comments. Both are welcome, of course, but our process would want each in an individual github issue. Lastly, we would welcome EO using content from this document wherever and however it sees fit in w3.org/wai resources. We do, however, believe it's important to publish a single document that lays out all the issues and approaches identified following several years research and editing in a single document. Again, if I'm misunderstanding the request here, please clarify. We'll happily cooperate to maximize the utility of this work.
from remote-meetings.
Second PDW is now available. Would welcome Github issues based on the latest drive.
from remote-meetings.
My understanding from informal communications that have taken place in the past week is as follows.
- The Education and Outreach Working Group currently has no substantive comments on the text of the most recent public working draft of the document.
- The Education and Outreach Working Group is satisfied with assurances from the Research Questions Task Force that material from this document may be cited, repurposed or reused by EO or other W3C/WAI groups, as appropriate, subsequently to its publication as a W3C Working Group Note.
- Thus, the EO review is complete at this point, and Accessibility of Remote Meetings may be considered for transition to W3C Note status.
In view of the above, I think we can close this issue. If any of the foregoing is inaccurate, please reopen the issue.
from remote-meetings.
Related Issues (12)
- [Accessibility of Remote Meetings] WAI standards HOT 3
- Should we streamline the quotations from UAAG 2.0 in section 3.3.2? HOT 3
- References should be made consistent. HOT 3
- The focus of section 4 is unclear, and parts of it may better belong in section 3. HOT 2
- Is audio and video testing capability a meeting platform requirement? HOT 2
- How should the use of collaborative editing tools in remote meetings be addressed in this document? HOT 1
- WCAG for content that is only shown? HOT 4
- Summarize important requirements from other documents, as appropriate HOT 1
- Clarify that availability of ASR-generated captions should not depend on decisions by meeting hosts.
- Clarify that meeting software should support editing of captions in recordings of meetings to improve textual accuracy and synchronization.
- Resource should not be in TR space HOT 3
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from remote-meetings.