Java smart contract wrappers does not support ABI with type of "address[] storage" about web3j

[androlo]

Hey sorry for "injecting" myself - putting storage modifier in the JSON interface seems like a Solidity error to me rather then web3j, since the only references you can create through an external call is to calldata and memory (in case it is a non-external function). I can't remember how this is treated in libraries since i never call those externally, but im guessing those functions should probably be omitted from the JSON ABI entirely.

[conor10]

Are you able to provide an ABI file extract? It may make sense to get web3j to ignore.

[colortigerhu]

Hello conor,

The ABI is here:
[{"constant":false,"inputs":[{"name":"i","type":"uint256"},{"name":"arry","type":"address[] storage"}],"name":"removeAddress","outputs":[],"payable":false,"type":"function"},{"constant":false,"inputs":[{"name":"a","type":"address"},{"name":"arry","type":"address[] storage"}],"name":"findAddress","outputs":[{"name":"","type":"int256"}],"payable":false,"type":"function"}]

File is uploaded(you can rename it to Lib1.abi):

Lib1.abi.txt

[conor10]

Fine - so web3j should ignore these when specified.

[conor10]

Fixed.