Question: Avoiding the static defaultInstance of WireMock about wiremock

[tomakehurst]

You can new up WireMock in addition to calling static methods on it e.g.
WireMock wireMock = new WireMock("localhost", "8082");
then create stubs like this:
wireMock.register(get(urlEqualTo("/test")).willReturn(aResponse().withHeader("Content-Type", "text/plain").withBody("Hello world!")));

Does that help?

[tobyweston]

Yep, thanks. I suspect they'll be more problems with the mismatch of static vs my instance. Do you recommend a particular way?

I'd still need the WireMockServer though right; if I'm new'ing up a WireMock as you suggest?

[tomakehurst]

I tend to use the instance approach if I'm wrapping wiremock inside another
class e.g. MyServiceStub. That way a number of these can co-habit provided
the ports don't clash.

Yes, you still need to run the server in this setup. The WireMock class is
just client code.
On 14 Mar 2013 20:15, "Toby" [email protected] wrote:

Yep, thanks. I suspect they'll be more problems with the mismatch of
static vs my instance. Do you recommend a particular way?

I'd still need the WireMockServer though right; if I'm new'ing up a
WireMock as you suggest?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/18#issuecomment-14926428
.

[mangotang]

That is some nice code.

 

---

Steven Barkdull
[email protected]

---

From: tomakehurst [email protected]
To: tomakehurst/wiremock [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: [wiremock] Question: Avoiding the static defaultInstance of WireMock (#18)

You can new up WireMock in addition to calling static methods on it e.g.
WireMock wireMock = new WireMock("localhost", "8082");
then create stubs like this:
wireMock.register(get(urlEqualTo("/test")).willReturn(aResponse().withHeader("Content-Type", "text/plain").withBody("Hello world!")));
Does that help?
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[tukaaa]

Hi there, I'm trying to achieve a similar thing, but I don't seem to find the right code for it; if I try something like this:

public MockedService(int port) {
    wireMock = new WireMock("localhost", port);
    wireMock.register(get(urlMatching("/process/?param1=.*&param2=.*"))
            .willReturn(aResponse()
                    .withBody(GenericMediaResponse.RESPONSE_OK.toJSONString()))
            );

     }

I get a ConnectionRefused issue.I would basically like to use WireMock to have a standalone embedded server that I can use as a test service for external tests, but I'm not sure how to hook handlers to WireMockServer and the relationship between WireMock and WireMockServer?

[tomakehurst]

WireMock is just the client part, so for this to work you'd need to run the server up from the command line, new up an instance of WireMockServer and start it or usr the @rule