Any plans for recursive links save? about monolith

[romanoff]

You are right. Was thinking that in case of recursive save, it would create a separate .html file for different page. But still be able to reference those pages if links are clicked. But this is just my idea how it could work. There are probably other solutions with their own benefits/downsides

[iacs]

even a simple --depth flag would be really useful e.g. if you archive an image gallery page and also want the images it links to backed up as well

[snshn]

Hi @romanoff
I believe this relates to #8
It's an upcoming feature that I need to think through and test thoroughly before releasing. Archiving whole website as one file could easily result in a couple hundred megabytes in size, potentially crashing the browser.

[eriteric]

even a simple --depth flag would be really useful e.g. if you archive an image gallery page and also want the images it links to backed up as well

exactly what I came looking for today, +1
was trying to save a webpage with images/gallery but the full images are linked.