acessocard / flurl.http.protobuf

Extension for Flurl.Http to support protobuf

Flurl.Http.Protobuf

Protobuf extension to Flurl library, using Protobuf-net to serialization

This is a community project, free and open source. Everyone is invited to contribute, fork, share and use the code.

---

Features

• Get, post, put and receive protobuf models

---

Usage

• Create your class or use .proto file

[ProtoContract]
class Person {
    [ProtoMember(1)]
    public int Id {get;set;}
    [ProtoMember(2)]
    public string Name {get;set;}
}

• Get an Protobuf:

var result = await "https://some.url".WithClient(client).GetProtobufAsync<Person>();

• Post and receive a model:

var obj = new Person
{
    Id = 1,
    Name = "Foo"
};

var result = await "https://some.url".PostProtobufAsync(obj);

• Put a model and receive:

 var obj = new Person
{
    Id = 2,
    Name = "Foo"
};

var result = await "https://some.url".PutProtobufAsync(obj).ReceiveProtobuf<Person>();

---

Support

To report a bug or request a feture, open an issue on GitHub.

---

Contributing

• Start creating an issue and describing your proposed fix/enhancement.
• Fork the project and make your change.
• Write tests to cover all new/changed functionality.

---

Maintainers/Core team

• Guilherme Baldini
• Fabricio Santos Hilário do Nascimento

Contributors can be found at the contributors page on Github.

---

Thanks

• protobuf-net
• Flurl

flurl.http.protobuf's Issues

Return Protobuf Object on HttpTest

In summary, when i use your feature i can't test with Flurl HttpTest, because this class don't have a option to respond with protobuf.

For solution, i can make a extension method to enable the test with protobuf.

This is the more simple way to solve this case for the tests and return a good experience for implementation.