When Adverse Event=”Yes”, instead of “Change?”, allow for choices of “No” and “Inconclusive”. about eacjr

[GeeEssEff]

nope - it's fine. Just explaining why I called it an enhancement and not a bug. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[jcjohnsonmo]

Ha! Well, okay. I'll keep thinking then. 😁

[jcjohnsonmo]

After thinking about this one, I've relabeled it as a bug rather than an enhancement because as it currently stands, it is not correct.

[GeeEssEff]

The reason for the difference in my mind. "It works as I wrote it" so it's not a broken part, it's a change on how things are done.

[jcjohnsonmo]

I see. I guess I was seeing it differently. I was seeing an "enhancement" as something that makes it better (e.g., easier to read) versus the situation here which is that although the code is working, the data it produces isn't what is needed. Do we need a different label?

[jcjohnsonmo]

I'll stop thinking about it now. 😁

[GeeEssEff]

no no! No worries, I just didn't want you to think I'm actually crazy