GithubHelp home page GithubHelp logo

Comments (6)

jsquire avatar jsquire commented on June 27, 2024 1

@cjablonski76:

You're saying there's nothing wrong with the way I'm currently doing it though (i.e. with builder.AddClient<ServiceBusClient, ServiceBusClientOptions>)?

Correct. There's nothing wrong with what you're currently doing, and it seems like the best approach for your specific scenario of not knowing the configuration that you want upfront. What you're doing will register the client and ensure proper cleanup.

from azure-sdk-for-net.

github-actions avatar github-actions commented on June 27, 2024

Thank you for your feedback. Tagging and routing to the team member best able to assist.

from azure-sdk-for-net.

jsquire avatar jsquire commented on June 27, 2024

Hi @cjablonski76. You are correct in that there is no overload that injects an IServiceProvider and the factory approach that you're using is the recommended way to do so. The resulting factory is invoked on-demand and the resulting client instance is cached and cleaned up.

If your goal is to provide configuration to the client or overload its options, there are other more direct ways to do so.

For example, to create a client based on configuration, the recommended approach is:

var appBuilder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
var serviceCollection = appBuilder.Services;

serviceCollection.AddAzureClients(builder =>
{
    builder.AddServiceBusClient(appBuilder.Configuration.GetSection("ServiceBus");
}

Overriding client options can be done in the following way, if you'd like to avoid the factory:

var appBuilder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
var serviceCollection = appBuilder.Services;

serviceCollection.AddAzureClients(builder =>
{
    builder
        .AddServiceBusClientWithNamespace("<your_namespace>.servicebus.windows.net");
        .ConfigureOptions(options =>
        {
            var myOptions = new MyOptions();
            appBuilder.Configuration["MyOptions"].Bind(myOptions);

            options.TransportType = myOptions.ServiceBusTransportType;
        });
}

More discussion and examples can be found in Dependency injection with the Azure SDK for .NET.

from azure-sdk-for-net.

github-actions avatar github-actions commented on June 27, 2024

Hi @cjablonski76. Thank you for opening this issue and giving us the opportunity to assist. We believe that this has been addressed. If you feel that further discussion is needed, please add a comment with the text "/unresolve" to remove the "issue-addressed" label and continue the conversation.

from azure-sdk-for-net.

cjablonski76 avatar cjablonski76 commented on June 27, 2024

@jsquire, the more in depth problem I have is that the configuration I'm trying to load has two possible service bus connections configured. So something like:

{
   "PrimaryConnection" : {
      "Namespace": "testing-primary-centralus.servicebus.windows.net"
   },
   "FailoverConnection": {
      "Namespace": "testing-failover-centralus.servicebus.windows.net"
   }
}

And deciding which service bus connection to use depends on some other DI dependency, so I end up doing something like:

serviceCollection
   .AddOptions<ServiceBusOptions>()
   .Configure<IConnectionPicker>((serviceBusOptions, connPicker) =>
   {
      var connectionToUse = connPicker.GetConnectionNameBasedOnPodLocation(); // return "Primary" or "Secondary"
      configurationSection.GetSection(connectionToUse).Bind(serviceBusOptions);
   });

serviceCollection.AddAzureClients(builder =>
{
    builder.AddClient<ServiceBusClient, ServiceBusClientOptions>((options, provider) =>
    {
        var serviceBusOptions =
                    provider.GetRequiredService<IOptions<ServiceBusOptions>>().Value;
        
        return new ServiceBusClient(serviceBusOptions.Namespace, new DefaultAzureCredential(), options);
    }
}

So it would have been convenient if to have access to the IServiceProvider in some AddServiceBus* methods so that I could stick to those methods without re-designing my above flow.

I think to accomplish what I'm talking about while using the AddServiceBus* methods, I would need to register both ServiceBusClient instances and name them appropriately, then I would push my IConnectionPicker down into the class that depends on ServiceBusClient and grab the correct instance with IAzureClientFactory<ServiceBusClient>.CreateClient(connPicker.GetConnectionNameBasedOnPodLocation());

You're saying there's nothing wrong with the way I'm currently doing it though (i.e. with builder.AddClient<ServiceBusClient, ServiceBusClientOptions>)?

from azure-sdk-for-net.

cjablonski76 avatar cjablonski76 commented on June 27, 2024

Awesome, thanks for the help!

from azure-sdk-for-net.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.