bluemix / vibes-typeface

My first Arabic typeface designed using Glyphs app

Hi there 👋

vibes-typeface's Issues

Google Fonts QA report

Fontbakery report

Fontbakery version: 0.7.9

[5] Vibes-Regular.ttf

🔥 FAIL: Copyright notices match canonical pattern in fonts

• com.google.fonts/check/font_copyright
• 🔥 FAIL Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: 'Copyright 2017 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)'
  But instead we have got: 'Copyright 2019 AbdElmomen Kadhim (blueMix) (https://github.com/bluemix/vibes-typeface)'
• 🔥 FAIL Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: 'Copyright 2017 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)'
  But instead we have got: 'Copyright 2019 AbdElmomen Kadhim (blueMix) (https://github.com/bluemix/vibes-typeface)'

⚠ WARN: Checking OS/2 achVendID.

• com.google.fonts/check/vendor_id
• ⚠ WARN OS/2 VendorID is 'UKWN', a font editor default. You should set it to your own 4 character code, and register that code with Microsoft at https://www.microsoft.com/typography/links/vendorlist.aspx [code: bad]

⚠ WARN: Stricter unitsPerEm criteria for Google Fonts.

• com.google.fonts/check/unitsperem_strict
• ⚠ WARN Even though unitsPerEm (1000) in this font is reasonable. It is strongly advised to consider changing it to 2000, since it will likely improve the quality of Variable Fonts by avoiding excessive rounding of coordinates on interpolations.

⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

• com.google.fonts/check/contour_count
• ⚠ WARN This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

Glyph name: uni2215 Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
Glyph name: quoteleft Contours detected: 0 Expected: 1
Glyph name: quoteright Contours detected: 0 Expected: 1
Glyph name: quotedblleft Contours detected: 0 Expected: 2
Glyph name: quotedblright Contours detected: 0 Expected: 2
Glyph name: quotedblbase Contours detected: 1 Expected: 2
Glyph name: bullet Contours detected: 3 Expected: 1
Glyph name: guilsinglleft Contours detected: 0 Expected: 1
Glyph name: guilsinglright Contours detected: 0 Expected: 1
Glyph name: uni1E9E Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
Glyph name: guillemotleft Contours detected: 0 Expected: 2
Glyph name: guillemotright Contours detected: 0 Expected: 2
Glyph name: germandbls Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
Glyph name: fraction Contours detected: 0 Expected: 1
Glyph name: lozenge Contours detected: 0 Expected: 2

⚠ WARN: Does GPOS table have kerning information?

• com.google.fonts/check/gpos_kerning_info
• ⚠ WARN GPOS table lacks kerning information.

Summary

💔 ERROR	🔥 FAIL	⚠ WARN	💤 SKIP	ℹ INFO	🍞 PASS
0	1	4	72	7	75
0%	1%	3%	45%	4%	47%

Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report:

• SKIP
• INFO
• PASS

Diff images: vibes_qa.zip