Unknown Warning while saving file or exporting Node about canopeneditor

[trojanobelix]

Can you provide the xdd file?

Four entries are missing:
The CNT_GFC entries (and others) are necessary if you have old eds file, that do not have "CO_countLabel" set.
So you might it be using a newer eds file for the test that supports CO_countLabel?

[PascalGuthof]

@trojanobelix Thanks for you reply. I have now tried again to create a variable on a new project and map it. This causes the error just like the project I already tested.
As it looks, this is a false warning. The OD I export from the project works as usual.

I have uploaded the file to a file hoster. I hope that's ok.:
https://www.mediafire.com/file/jivtx1yv0xxxepr/DS301_profile.xpd/file

[CANopenNode]

The only difference I see at first sight is that in OD.h four entries are missing. but I don't know their purpose.

The "New OD.h" seems to be correct, my (old version) it is the same. The "Old OD.h" is strange anyway.

[trojanobelix]

The warnings come because a t access is expected for an RPDO and an r access for a TDPO. However, Vector's EDS checker is quite happy with the assignment of r to RPDO and t to TPDO. I'll take another look at the whole thing in a larger context. There are some PRs on the subject of PDO access type, but I can't really assess them yet. It depends a lot on whether you define the whole thing from a consumer or producer point of view. p and c might have been the better choice :-).

[trojanobelix]

You should change the Access SDO of 6000, 6002, 6004 to rwr, if it is a TPDO.

[PascalGuthof]

Sorry, I was on holiday until last week.

Thanks for all the feedback and the help!

You should change the Access SDO of 6000, 6002, 6004 to rwr, if it is a TPDO.

I don't know what you mean. I can only set the access to no, ro, wo and rw.

The warnings come because a t access is expected for an RPDO and an r access for a TDPO

Yes I know this point of view from CanOpen for Python.
But if I set the access to r for a TPDO, I can't map the TPDO because it just doesn't show up in the mapping tab.
But maybe I just don't understand exactly what you mean.
I followed the video tutorial from @HamedJafarzadeh and he did it the same way. In the program it worked fine for me.

The only difference I see at first sight is that in OD.h four entries are missing. but I don't know their purpose.

The "New OD.h" seems to be correct, my (old version) it is the same. The "Old OD.h" is strange anyway.

The "Old OD.h" is from a fork of the EDS editor. This was also from @HamedJafarzadeh. Maybe there was a bug in his version, but even with that my program worked almost fine.

[CANopenNode]

I also get the same warnings when I export https://github.com/CANopenNode/CANopenDemo/blob/master/demo/demoDevice.xdd to OD.h/c V4 files.

The warnings come because a t access is expected for an RPDO and an r access for a TDPO.

We have to clarify this. I was using t for TPDO and r for RPDO. Please see commit 26a11e1

There is only a misplaced warning, generated code seems to be correct.

[PascalGuthof]

I also get the same warnings when I export https://github.com/CANopenNode/CANopenDemo/blob/master/demo/demoDevice.xdd to OD.h/c V4 files.

The warnings come because a t access is expected for an RPDO and an r access for a TDPO.

We have to clarify this. I was using t for TPDO and r for RPDO. Please see commit 26a11e1

There is only a misplaced warning, generated code seems to be correct.

Thanks for checking and the effort. Then I can ignore the warning. That helps me a lot.

[trojanobelix]

Reopened for tracking. It is still an open issue.

[trojanobelix]

should be fixed in a43e0a8

Test and feedback would be much appreciated

[trojanobelix]

Will be closed in a few days due to lack of feedback