syscall 'function' in decompile window not showing syscall number about ghidra-emotionengine-reloaded

[chaoticgd]

It looks like it shows the "code" field of the instruction in the decompilation instead of the syscall number, same as Ghidra's built-in MIPS implementation.

Usually syscalls are called through wrapper functions, so I imagine a good solution would be to give said functions appropriate names. Maybe that could be a feature in the future.

[chaoticgd]

I remember Ghidra added better syscall support a few years back, but I never looked much into it. Maybe I could see if that would help.

[RobertCochran]

Usually syscalls are called through wrapper functions, so I imagine a good solution would be to give said functions appropriate names. Maybe that could be a feature in the future.

In my very limited experience, this has usually been the case, except when it isn't; I have noticed in a couple places in the early bootstrap process of Ratchet 1 where there are direct syscalls. (the helper function in those cases got inlined away?)