Standardize WG metadata to ease community interactions about community

[chipchilders]

thanks @chipchilders

BTW, it seems that @cloudfoundry/governance-wg is'nt yet public as https://github.com/orgs/cloudfoundry/teams/governance-wg is returning a 404. Any chance to open read visibility of teams in the cloudfoundry community for everyone ?

Sorry... that team was specifically to get through the process of forming a proposal here in this repo. The members today are: @jenspinney @loewenstein @julz @friegger @smoser-ibm @aclark801 (and myself for support).

[chipchilders]

Absolutely agree with this. Does anyone want to propose a PR that addresses more details about metadata for the WG's? @cloudfoundry/governance-wg or anyone else?

[gberche-orange]

thanks @chipchilders

BTW, it seems that @cloudfoundry/governance-wg is'nt yet public as https://github.com/orgs/cloudfoundry/teams/governance-wg is returning a 404. Any chance to open read visibility of teams in the cloudfoundry community for everyone ?

[gberche-orange]

Unfortunately, according https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/github/setting-up-and-managing-organizations-and-teams/changing-team-visibility github organization teams seems to only be visible to organization members.

Any chance for CFF to add representative of CFF members to the organization, or more generally CFF community users ?

[chipchilders]

Unfortunately, according https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/github/setting-up-and-managing-organizations-and-teams/changing-team-visibility github organization teams seems to only be visible to organization members.

Any chance for CFF to add representative of CFF members to the organization, or more generally CFF community users ?

Opened #38 to address this question.

[chipchilders]

TOC will need to address this once started. Tagging with icebox.

[emalm]

We've embedded YAML documents in each WG charter that provide a more structured representation of the WG membership and repository scope, and https://github.com/cloudfoundry/community/blob/main/toc/working-groups/WORKING-GROUPS.md has some regularized info about the WG processes. If there is other information that's important to represent systematically, we can handle that on specific new issues.