Extension malfunction about responsive_sizer

[radvansky-tomas]

Feel free to test my fork, I will check your calculations too, as that sp/dp implementation was real pain to implement

[titoworlddev]

@CoderUni thanks for paying attention to the requests that improves the package a lot. If you have time to notify here when it is updated, it would be appreciated so I will implement it in my application.

[CoderUni]

Since there are more people who wanted .w and .h extensions to reflect the actual width and height of the device regardless of the orientation, I'll be changing the way this package works. For the sp implementation, I would be using @radvansky-tomas's implementation which can be found in this fork. I'll be updating the package once I have more time to work on it. Thanks for filing this issue.

[CoderUni]

@radvansky-tomas Could you create a PR?

[zxl777]

print("w=${100.w} h=${100.h}");
w=768.0 h=1024.0

This value is the same regardless of the rotation angle of the iPad.

But what I expected is that the bottom side is width.

Can you change it?

[CoderUni]

@zxl777 @Hekhy I've updated the package to v3.0.1. Did it fix your issue?

[zxl777]

Thank you, I have tested the 3.01 example, and this problem has been solved perfectly.

There are two suggestions:

1. Update the document to explain the description of Device.height and so on.
2. Can be added in the example

Text(
             "w=${100.w} h=${100.h}",
             style: TextStyle(fontSize: 12.sp), // or Adaptive.sp(12)
           ),

In this way, we can intuitively understand the attributes of w and h.

[CoderUni]

Thanks for the suggestions @zxl777, I've added the explanation in the docs a few days ago and I've just added the code snippet you've provided in the example.

[zxl777]

Awesome 👏