contraexemplo / makeitopen Goto Github PK

My knowledge on this is very limited in terms of being more familiarized with how cultural funding works in Brazil. The perspective from people from other countries would be incredibly helpful.

This is a common source of uncertainty and insecurity to institutions, especially those who may profit from related content created by them. This guide should:

• List the benefits of choosing a license that allows commercial use
• Describe the limitations a non commercial license imposes to open projects
• Provide strategies to reach an agreement with institutions while making sure to respect their autonomy

git and GitHub are specialized tools aimed for developers. Their learning curve isn't exactly the most easy to follow, especially to non-tech savvy folks. I need to think of a better solution to accommodate them better while also keeping revision control tools. Here are some of the options I thought about:

• Create a wiki (possibly using MediaWiki) with integration with GitHub. Determine a routine to pull recent changes from the wiki to this repository and organize them in commits.
• Create a website (possibly static) presenting our content in a more friendly way. Maybe use Hugo or any other static website generator. Use this repository structure to then organize content in categories and such using a gh-pages branch.

Requirements:

• Must be easy to read and explore
• Must have integration with a revision control tool