deeptoaster / opcode-table Goto Github PK

Instead of "immediately", the third to last word in ei's description is "immediatediyl".

The opcode AF also known as instruction xor a, a guarantees that a is 0. The zero flag is labeled as "as defined". This is in fact true, but since the flag will always be set no matter what, shouldn't it say set instead?

Sorry if this is too nit-picky.

Some time ago I made this i8085 table, cloned from your Z80 table.

https://gitlab.com/feilipu/8085-opcodes

I'm happy to generate a PR if you like, but since you've changed quite a lot since I cloned the table it might be cleaner just for you to scrape it, whereby I'll archive my repo.

It contains both the undocumented instructions (that I use quite a lot), and some synthetic instructions added to z88dk to make programming nicer. The synthetics are typically two instructions that work together and don't cause side effects, but make reading code clear. For general usage, its probably best to just stick to the main 256 bytes table.

I would like a search function like there was in the last version. For example entering something like "ld a," highlighted all commands that load anything into register a.

While the new layout looks more modern it makes the site more annoying to use, the highlighting doesn't work the same, half the screen is filled with useless information on arriving, tables & text are monstrously big now.

Thanks

In new version if you mouse over a row/column heading then move mouse into the table body within that row/column the cell mouseover doesn't trigger the "tooltip" for the cell...

e.g. hover on '7' column heading above rlca, rla etc, then mouse down over rlca, rla, daa... if you mouse out of the column/row within the table body the "correct" table cell highlighting and tooltip behaviour returns.

Original site "worked" as expected, i.e. as you mouse out of the row/column heading onto a table cell the highlight switched to per cell highlighting.

I heard Z280 keeps undocumented instructions unlike Z180 and add some 16-bit operations. Wouldn't it be interesting to add them as well?