eigenhombre / clj-org

An Org Mode parser

Hello!

• I’m currently working on personal tech projects, my painting/drawing practice, and software development for the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. See the Now Page on my Website for more info.
• How to reach me: my Website.
• Fun fact: I've spent about six months at the Geographic South Pole over ten trips.

clj-org's Issues

Minimum Viable Repo checklist

From https://gist.github.com/eigenhombre/204400c786f9dba3a8d3193d3ce1542a:

• LICENSE file, including disclaimer
• Automated build via Docker and GitHub Actions
• Automated builds include unit tests
• Automated builds include linting
• Build badge
• Artwork
• Versioned
• Minimum snippet / example
• Link to API and/or help output
• Release procedure is automated
• Project available in public package manager
• Track outstanding TODOs in Issues

Accept lower-case versions for SRC blocks, etc.

Hi!

Newer versions of Org mode since this commit (https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/commit/13424336a6f30c50952d291e7a82906c1210daf0?style=split) default to using lower-case versions of blocks BEGIN_SRC -> begin_src. Both versions are acceptable to Org, but this library only looks for uppercase versions.

I know @eigenhombre that you aren't really using this library anymore, so if you are interested, I'd be willing to take over some maintenance duties for this library, as I use it in my blog generation. I'd rather help this library along vs forking and putting another artifact name out there.

A ordered lists not supported?

(parse-org "1. maybe 2. some lists?
")
{:title nil, :headers "", :content [:div [:p "1. maybe 2. some lists?\n"]]}

Change from speclj to clojure.test

Existing example tests are a better fit for the more standard and common clojure.test/are.

Idea for collaboration

Hello, I found your project from the worg tools list. First, sorry for the semi-spam nature of this issue. I had a notion for a project that the org community might find useful and I'm looking for feedback. Feel free to close this issue if it doesn't sound useful to you.

My idea is to start a list of org-mode snippets which can serve as a test bed for people developing tools. The idea is that having a separate collection of examples makes it easier for others in the community to benefit from the examples developed through communication with users.

Users could use these samples to try to construct minimal examples of issues they're having and/or contribute examples there which others could benefit from. Exactly how it will take shape is still up in the air.

These samples could also serve as a place to discuss ideas about how to develop the grammar itself. According to worg, the spec is still in draft state.

There's not much there at the moment. Mostly because I don't want to commit too early to what seems like it might be useful. I'll add more examples as I go.

If you like the concept and/or want to contribute and/or just want to offer feedback, I'd very much appreciate it.

Again, sorry for the spam.