GithubHelp home page GithubHelp logo

kickstarter-analysis's Introduction

Kickstarting with Excel

Overview of Project

An analysis on the historical data of various theater-based Kickstarter campaigns in order to identify and compile corelating factors; providing insight into which ones have been successful.

Purpose

To enable our client to set realistic target goals and determine the most appropriate time to execute their campaign.

Analysis and Challenges

In order to create an appropriate overview based on the information provided, we have corelated several factors against the success rate of productions.

Analysis of Outcomes Based on Launch Date

Utilizing launch date information combined with the success rate of various productions, we have been able to identify specific trends relating to the time of year a production was launched. The data suggests that productions launched during May and June had a higher rate of success. The volume of campaigns were greater during this time period with the success rate of 67%, 17% higher than the lowest success rate of 49% in December. Visually the success rate in October had an uptick but there was also a greater uptick in failed campaigns resulting in only 56% of campaigns being successful. Graphing the volumetric ratio of successful and failed campaigns would provide another level of insight, however May and June had success rates of 66% and 65% respectively so the data suggests the is an advantage to these time periods for launch.
Theater_Outcomes_vs_Launch

The resulting analysis matches the overall success patterns for all categories of Kickstarter campaigns with May having the highest success rate with all categories factored in. Outcomes_vs_Launch

The average success rate was 60% for plays that year. There are many factors that can affect a successful campaign, isolating specific variables can provide insight, however by eliminating data points our ability to provide accurate assumptions based on the data could be challenged. We can conclude that positioning your launch date to capture the increased interest in funding campaigns during the spring would have a quantitative advantage.

Analysis of Outcomes Based on Goals

Utilizing the goal data from the campaigns across increments of ~$5000 enables us to see if there are any trends relating to the requested amounts and people’s willingness to fund them. Campaigns with goals under $5000 faired the best with a 76% success rate in the $1000-$4999 bracket and 80% for campaigns with goals under $1000. Campaigns with goals set between $35000 to $44999 saw an uptick in success rates resulting in a 67% success rate across the two brackets. The volume of campaigns was significantly higher in the sub $5000 dollar range. We can see an increased success percentage in the $35000-$44999 goal categories, although there was a significantly lower number of campaigns and the volume does not provide conclusive evidence that these trends would be consistent year to year. The most reliable assumption based on the data provided would suggest that maintaining a target goal under $5000 would give your production a higher likelihood of success. Outcomes_vs_Goals

Challenges and Difficulties Encountered

The small size of the data set limits our ability to find anomalies within the data. The data does not included the methods in which these campaigns were marketed which makes it difficult to make direct comparisons. There is valuable insight contained within the failed campaigns which could be explored further.

Results

We can conclude that May had the highest number of successful campaigns and the highest volume of total campaigns.

We can conclude that goals of under $5000 had the greatest chance of success. The increased success rate in the $35000-$44999 goal category is based on a small volume and appears to be atypical.

This dataset has some limitations, primarily the small size of the data set makes it difficult to isolate anomalies.

To gain additional insight we could compare success rate not only based on the months, but also the year of production. The length of the campaign could also play a significant factor in determine which ones were successful. In addition to this, graphing the amount and quantity of donations would enable us to gain insight from both successful and failed campaigns.

kickstarter-analysis's People

Contributors

findthefunction avatar

Watchers

 avatar

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.