garzon / obfacros

obfacros - a set of C++ macros that can be used to obfuscate your c/c++ code, to make executables harder for reverse-engineering.

obfacros

obfacros - a set of macros written in C++14 with g++5, that can be used to obfuscate your c/c++ code, to make it harder for reverse-engineering.

I use this to generate the CTF challenge of "Obfuscating Macros I/II" in DDCTF / *ctf 2019.

Demo

Please find the demo.cpp. To compile, just g++ demo.cpp -std=c++14 -o demo.out.

Features

• easy to use: header-only, just include the provided obfacros.hpp and write your code in a way similar to plain c/c++, then compile with g++.
• easy to disable: to disable the obfuscation, you just need to replace the macros by normal code like: #define FOR(init, cond, end, ...) for(init; cond; end) { __VA_ARGS__; }. Check demo_obfacros_disabled.cpp and the section A way to disable the obfuscation in the document.
• much harder for reverse-engineering: by flattening the control flow and using dynamic JUMPs

If necessary, the macros may be modified into another form which do not require any features of C++14 or g++.

Usage

1. #include "obfacros.hpp"
2. write your code using the macros rather than the for/if/while c/c++ keywords
3. compile and enjoy!

Basic rules and WARNINGS

0. Using all macros(like FOR/IF/RETURN...) ONLY IN the obfacros scope(between FUNCTION_START(var_to_accept_return_value) and FUNCTION_END;)
1. DO NOT declare variables inside the scope. Please declare all the variables outside in advance.
2. Avoid using {} in the obfacros scope. If you want to use {} anyway, please do not use any obfacros inside the {}(before the bracket is closed).

Document

Basic features

FUNCTION_START(retVal) and FUNCTION_END;

Write this before using any other obfacros to create a scope of obfacros (or we call it obfacros scope or the scope).

retVal specifies the variable to be assigned when RETURN. If you do not use RETURN, just fill in a random variable.

FOR(init, cond, end, ...);

just like for (init; cond; end) { ... } in c/c++

WHILE(expr, ...);

just like while (expr) { ... } in c/c++

IF(expr, ...); and IF_ELSE(expr, ...)

just like if (expr) { ... } in c/c++, but with a difference that:

if (expr) { code; } should be written in the form of IF(expr, code);
if (expr) { code; } else { code2; } should be written in the form of IF_ELSE(expr, code) ELSE (code2);

In a word, before you use any ELIF or ELSE, please check the previous macro is with the suffix _ELSE. Likewise, we also have ELIF and ELIF_ELSE.

RETURN(val);

Jump to next line of FUNCTION_END(jump out of the scope of obfacros) and assign the val to retVal that specified in FUNCTION_START.

Advanced features

If you use any of advanced features, you may not easily disable the obfuscation because there is no corresponding features in the language of c/c++.

For demo, please visit the source code of one of my CTF reverse challenge: https://github.com/garzon/my_ctf_challenges_source_code/tree/master/starctf_2019/obfuscating_macros_II

BLOCK(...);

Manually create a code block. Just like { code }; in c/c++.

MAKE_BLOCK_WITH_NAME(name, ...);

Create a code block with a name. Just like if (false) { name: code }; in c/c++.

INCLUDE_BLOCK(name);

"include" a previously defined named block(by MAKE_BLOCK_WITH_NAME). Like a function call in c/c++ with variables shared.

A way to disable the obfuscation

1. Comment out #include "obfacros.hpp"
2. Using the code below to replace the obfacros:

#define FUNCTION_START(...)
#define FUNCTION_END
#define BLOCK(...) { __VA_ARGS__; }
#define IF(expr, ...) if (expr) { __VA_ARGS__; } else {}
#define FOR(init, cond, end, ...) for(init; cond; end) { __VA_ARGS__; }
#define WHILE(expr, ...) while(expr) { __VA_ARGS__; }
#define IF_ELSE(expr, ...) if (expr) { __VA_ARGS__; }
#define ELSE(...) else { __VA_ARGS__; }
#define ELIF(expr, ...) else { if (expr) { __VA_ARGS__; } }
#define ELIF_ELSE(expr, ...) else if (expr) { __VA_ARGS__; }
#define RETURN(...) return (__VA_ARGS__)

obfacros's Issues

Love this!

You can mark as fixed. But I just want to congratulate you for making this.

I had a similar idea of writing C++ macros to create arithmetic identities using a combination of trig, algebriac geometry, discrete math, and linear algebra.