gitskarios / githubandroidsdk Goto Github PK

GithubEvent objects all have a Payload field, but this is completely unrelated to all the *Payload beans that existed in the project before, and breaks usages where we previously casted the payload object to the appropriate type. What's their relationship, and how should these new Payload objects be used considering they don't share all the same fields as their previous Payload variants (such as ref_type, target, or gist).

Alright now we can use the lib without compiling it locally. So do we want to use maven (jcenter) or should we implement JitPack. JitPack might be simpler for you but maven might be cleaner. It's up to you. The third option is to just release a .arr to the GitHub repo.

I know I'm a little bit stressed but I'd love to be able to use it at the GitHub app over at forkhubs :D

As this project is listed on the GitHub developers page, and being the only Android SDK / API for GitHub, could you provide documentation to show how this can be used.

Ideally something similar to the example on this project's README, but showcasing all of the features and how they can be used in Android.

Blablabla.

Hotgirl.jpg

Is this something we want to implement? It looks like we would have to add two Service methods for every api call.

Nothing wrong with it just asking cause it's only returning null for the moment

Can I give a demo Thanks！

Just now I tried to use this library but gradle couldn't get it with 'compile 'com.github.alorma:github-sdk:2.1.0' but when changing to 'compile 'com.github.alorma:github-sdk:+' it works because the latest version is 2.1.2 .

i am now using maven.can you please provide support for maven,

[TEST] Test it baby description :P

Say you have a CommitComment and want to pass it as a parcel object in a bundle. When parceled, the only parceling implementation is in the parent GithubComment, which parcels its subset of the data into a GitHubComment and only passes that. Result is a crash on the other side when you try to pull out a CommitComment and only get a GitHubComment

Test issue requested by owner

Since they share the basic values.

RequestTokenClient overrides the execute() method (I believe) in order to bypass the requirement to have a token prior to making the call. Thought the executeSync method does not reflect the same change and instead always returns null.

i can build githubandroidsdk and gitskarios-core success,but when i use the sdk in my project by dependency like this
https://github.com/wsdjeg/learnandroidthehardway/blob/master/pom.xml
and the build command i am using is mvn clean package,i get the errer ,i am tring to fix it

GithubReposClient client = new UserReposClient(getActivity(), username);
client.setOnResultCallback(callback);
client.execute();

Presently, GithubComment has a writeToParcel() implemented but no Parcelable.Creator. As a result, it ends up inheriting that from ShaUrl. So any GithubComment you put in the Parcel gets downcasted to ShaUrl resulting in a crash if you attempt to get a GithubComment from the Parcel.

El problema es de tu ISP

Error:Failed to resolve: GithubAndroidSdk:GitskariosCore:unspecified

Any ideas? Only happens on 2.1.0

I need to get github user details from my android application. is it possible to get user informations, if i use this sdk? . i could not get enough information from READ ME page. could anyone help me?

What I can do?

buildscript {
    repositories {
        jcenter()
        maven {
            url  "http://dl.bintray.com/alorma/maven"
        }
    }
    dependencies {
        classpath 'com.android.tools.build:gradle:1.3.0'
    }
}
allprojects {
    repositories {
        jcenter()
    }
}

This is a nice project, have you thought to implement unit tests?

All the observables currently automatically choose Schedulers.io(). This is bad IMO, as this prevents users from using their own scheduler for these. subcribeOn will basically only work once, so it can't be overloaded.

Example:

Schedulers.io() basically spins off a new thread every time there's a new task. Not everyone wants this, and it's not uncommon to use your own bounded IO scheduler when developing in a more limited environment (aka mobile apps)