Shiwei Gan*, Lichen Wang*, Xiao Liu, Yafeng Yin†, Kuizhuang Liu, Sanglu Lu, Lei Xie
Nanjing University
* Equal contribution † Corresponding author
From fixed video-to-label mappings to flexible, question-driven sign language understanding.
- 2026-08-20: Project page and paper PDF released.
- 2026-07-30: SignQA-2026 annotations released on Hugging Face.
- 2026-07-30: Paper released on arXiv.
Existing sign language understanding tasks usually learn a fixed mapping from a video to a sign class, gloss sequence, or spoken-language translation. These objectives reveal only part of what a model understands and cannot flexibly respond to different user questions about the same video.
We introduce Sign Language Question Answering (SLQA): given a sign video and a natural-language question, a model must generate the corresponding answer. SLQA evaluates fine-grained visual retrieval, temporal and structural reasoning, gloss recognition, and sentence-level semantic understanding in one unified framework.
| 🧩 New Task | 📊 New Benchmark | 🚀 Strong Baseline |
|---|---|---|
| The first SLQA formulation for answering diverse questions grounded directly in sign videos. | Two multilingual SignQA benchmarks with 144,550 QA pairs over 28,910 videos. | SLQAM, featuring question-conditioned temporal downsampling and in-domain knowledge transfer. |
SignQA-2026 is constructed from the gloss and translation annotations of PHOENIX-2014T and CSL-Daily. It covers five complementary question categories, ranging from low-level sequence reasoning to high-level language understanding.
- M1 - Position Reasoning: identify a gloss at a specified position.
- M2 - Structural Reasoning: reason about neighboring signs and subsequences.
- M3 - Visual Search: locate a target gloss or identify non-manual markers.
- M4 - Gloss Recognition: recover the complete gloss sequence.
- M5 - Translation Understanding: understand the spoken-language meaning.
| Benchmark | Language | Train | Dev | Test | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHOENIX-2014T-QA | German | 35,480 | 2,595 | 3,210 | 41,285 |
| CSL-Daily-QA | Chinese | 92,000 | 5,385 | 5,880 | 103,265 |
| Total | - | 127,480 | 7,980 | 9,090 | 144,550 |
Note
The Hugging Face release contains QA annotations and video identifiers. Source videos are not redistributed. Please obtain PHOENIX-2014T and CSL-Daily separately and follow their original access and license terms.
Our baseline, SLQAM (Sign2Answer), contains three major components:
- a visual backbone for frame-level sign representations;
- Question-Conditioned Modulated Temporal Downsampling (QCMTD) for selecting question-relevant temporal information;
- a language model for answer generation.
We further introduce a three-stage in-domain knowledge transfer pipeline: CSLR pre-training → SLT training → SLQA fine-tuning. This progressively transfers sign perception, temporal alignment, and language generation knowledge to the new SLQA task.
SLQAM consistently outperforms general-purpose video-language models and the cascaded Sign2Text2Answer baseline on both benchmarks. The table below reports overall test-set results from the paper.
| Model | PHOENIX RL ↑ | PHOENIX BLEURT ↑ | PHOENIX CIDEr ↑ | CSL-Daily RL ↑ | CSL-Daily BLEURT ↑ | CSL-Daily CIDEr ↑ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VideoLLaMA3-2B | 44.69 | 37.45 | 1.252 | 60.51 | 38.24 | 1.735 |
| Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct | 47.70 | 42.02 | 1.410 | 60.24 | 38.32 | 1.699 |
| InternVL3-2B | 50.93 | 45.45 | 1.736 | 64.27 | 44.31 | 2.277 |
| Sign2Text2Answer | 53.54 | 54.54 | 2.343 | 70.75 | 54.04 | 3.754 |
| SLQAM (Sign2Answer) | 54.16 | 56.21 | 2.768 | 73.52 | 60.23 | 4.193 |
RL denotes ROUGE-L. Higher is better for all metrics shown. See Tables 5-8 in the paper for complete per-task and BLEU results.
The annotations are available at hulala/SignQA-2026.
from datasets import load_dataset
# Chinese benchmark
csl_daily = load_dataset("hulala/SignQA-2026", "csl-daily-qa")
# German benchmark
phoenix14t = load_dataset("hulala/SignQA-2026", "phoenix14t-qa")Each annotation contains the source video_id, split, dataset, module,
question-template ID, question, answer, and language.
- Release the paper
- Release SignQA-2026 annotations
- Release the project page
- Release training and evaluation code
- Release pretrained checkpoints
- Release detailed preprocessing instructions
If you find this work useful, please cite:
@misc{gan2026signlanguagequestionanswering,
title = {Sign Language Question Answering: A New Task, Benchmark,
and Baseline for Sign Language Understanding},
author = {Shiwei Gan and Lichen Wang and Xiao Liu and Yafeng Yin and
Kuizhuang Liu and Sanglu Lu and Lei Xie},
year = {2026},
eprint = {2607.27826},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
primaryClass = {cs.AI},
doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2607.27826},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27826}
}We thank the creators of PHOENIX-2014T and CSL-Daily for making their resources available to the sign language research community.



