In this task, we introduce multiple SGD-based optimization methods. As you have learned from the last assignment, SGD is an efficient method to update parameters. However, to make SGD perform well, we need to find an appropriate learning rate and a good initial value. Otherwise, the network will get stuck if learning rate is small, or it will diverge if the learning rate is too large. In reality, since we have no prior knowledge about the training data, it is not trivial to find a good learning rate manually. Also, when the network becomes deeper, for each layer we may need to set a different learning rate, and that will again increase the development workload. Obviously, this is not a good direction.
Another common problem is the lack of sufficient training data. This can make our training get stuck when using the naive SGD method.
So, how to set a good learning rate? You are going to experiment with SGD with momentum, RMSProp, Adam and make comparisons.
All of these optimizers are adaptive learning rate methods. Here is a useful link: http://ruder.io/optimizing-gradient-descent/.
% matplotlib inline
% load_ext autoreload
% autoreload 2
# Import modules
from __future__ import print_function
import tensorflow as tf
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from ecbm4040.cifar_utils import load_dataHere we use a small dataset with only 2500 samples to simulate "lack-of-data" situation.
# Load the raw CIFAR-10 data.
X_train, y_train, X_test, y_test = load_data()
X_val = X_train[:500,:]
y_val = y_train[:500]
X_train = X_train[500:2500,:]
y_train = y_train[500:2500]
mean_image = np.mean(X_train, axis=0).astype(np.float32)
X_train = X_train.astype(np.float32) - mean_image
X_val = X_val.astype(np.float32) - mean_image
# We've vectorized the data for you. That is, we flatten the 32×32×3 images into 1×3072 Numpy arrays.
print('Training data shape: ', X_train.shape)
print('Training labels shape: ', y_train.shape)
print('Validation data shape: ', X_val.shape)
print('Validation labels shape: ', y_val.shape)Start downloading data...
Download complete.
Training data shape: (2000, 3072)
Training labels shape: (2000,)
Validation data shape: (500, 3072)
Validation labels shape: (500,)
Here we provide an MLP code snippet for testing.
from ecbm4040.neuralnets.mlp import MLPfrom ecbm4040.optimizers import SGDOptim
model = MLP(input_dim=3072, hidden_dims=[100, 100], num_classes=10, weight_scale=1e-3, l2_reg=0.0)
optimizer = SGDOptim()
hist_sgd = optimizer.train(model, X_train, y_train, X_val, y_val,
num_epoch=30, batch_size=200, learning_rate=1e-2, learning_decay=0.95,
verbose=False, record_interval=1)number of batches for training: 10
epoch 1: valid acc = 0.146, new learning rate = 0.0095
epoch 2: valid acc = 0.146, new learning rate = 0.009025
epoch 3: valid acc = 0.154, new learning rate = 0.00857375
epoch 4: valid acc = 0.152, new learning rate = 0.0081450625
epoch 5: valid acc = 0.154, new learning rate = 0.007737809374999999
epoch 6: valid acc = 0.166, new learning rate = 0.007350918906249998
epoch 7: valid acc = 0.168, new learning rate = 0.006983372960937498
epoch 8: valid acc = 0.17, new learning rate = 0.006634204312890623
epoch 9: valid acc = 0.164, new learning rate = 0.006302494097246091
epoch 10: valid acc = 0.162, new learning rate = 0.005987369392383786
epoch 11: valid acc = 0.164, new learning rate = 0.005688000922764597
epoch 12: valid acc = 0.164, new learning rate = 0.005403600876626367
epoch 13: valid acc = 0.17, new learning rate = 0.005133420832795048
epoch 14: valid acc = 0.168, new learning rate = 0.0048767497911552955
epoch 15: valid acc = 0.168, new learning rate = 0.00463291230159753
epoch 16: valid acc = 0.17, new learning rate = 0.0044012666865176535
epoch 17: valid acc = 0.166, new learning rate = 0.004181203352191771
epoch 18: valid acc = 0.168, new learning rate = 0.003972143184582182
epoch 19: valid acc = 0.168, new learning rate = 0.0037735360253530726
epoch 20: valid acc = 0.168, new learning rate = 0.0035848592240854188
epoch 21: valid acc = 0.166, new learning rate = 0.0034056162628811476
epoch 22: valid acc = 0.166, new learning rate = 0.0032353354497370902
epoch 23: valid acc = 0.166, new learning rate = 0.0030735686772502355
epoch 24: valid acc = 0.166, new learning rate = 0.0029198902433877237
epoch 25: valid acc = 0.166, new learning rate = 0.0027738957312183374
epoch 26: valid acc = 0.166, new learning rate = 0.0026352009446574203
epoch 27: valid acc = 0.168, new learning rate = 0.002503440897424549
epoch 28: valid acc = 0.168, new learning rate = 0.0023782688525533216
epoch 29: valid acc = 0.168, new learning rate = 0.0022593554099256553
epoch 30: valid acc = 0.168, new learning rate = 0.0021463876394293723
TODO: Edit SGDmomentumOptim in ./ecbm4040/optimizers.py
from ecbm4040.optimizers import SGDmomentumOptim
model = MLP(input_dim=3072, hidden_dims=[100, 100], num_classes=10, l2_reg=0.0, weight_scale=1e-3)
optimizer = SGDmomentumOptim(model, momentum=0.8)
hist_sgd_momentum = optimizer.train(model, X_train, y_train, X_val, y_val,
num_epoch=30, batch_size=200, learning_rate=1e-2,
learning_decay=0.95, verbose=False, record_interval=1)number of batches for training: 10
epoch 1: valid acc = 0.152, new learning rate = 0.0095
epoch 2: valid acc = 0.164, new learning rate = 0.009025
epoch 3: valid acc = 0.17, new learning rate = 0.00857375
epoch 4: valid acc = 0.166, new learning rate = 0.0081450625
epoch 5: valid acc = 0.168, new learning rate = 0.007737809374999999
epoch 6: valid acc = 0.17, new learning rate = 0.007350918906249998
epoch 7: valid acc = 0.176, new learning rate = 0.006983372960937498
epoch 8: valid acc = 0.176, new learning rate = 0.006634204312890623
epoch 9: valid acc = 0.192, new learning rate = 0.006302494097246091
epoch 10: valid acc = 0.188, new learning rate = 0.005987369392383786
epoch 11: valid acc = 0.192, new learning rate = 0.005688000922764597
epoch 12: valid acc = 0.194, new learning rate = 0.005403600876626367
epoch 13: valid acc = 0.194, new learning rate = 0.005133420832795048
epoch 14: valid acc = 0.194, new learning rate = 0.0048767497911552955
epoch 15: valid acc = 0.192, new learning rate = 0.00463291230159753
epoch 16: valid acc = 0.192, new learning rate = 0.0044012666865176535
epoch 17: valid acc = 0.186, new learning rate = 0.004181203352191771
epoch 18: valid acc = 0.186, new learning rate = 0.003972143184582182
epoch 19: valid acc = 0.186, new learning rate = 0.0037735360253530726
epoch 20: valid acc = 0.186, new learning rate = 0.0035848592240854188
epoch 21: valid acc = 0.188, new learning rate = 0.0034056162628811476
epoch 22: valid acc = 0.184, new learning rate = 0.0032353354497370902
epoch 23: valid acc = 0.186, new learning rate = 0.0030735686772502355
epoch 24: valid acc = 0.188, new learning rate = 0.0029198902433877237
epoch 25: valid acc = 0.186, new learning rate = 0.0027738957312183374
epoch 26: valid acc = 0.186, new learning rate = 0.0026352009446574203
epoch 27: valid acc = 0.188, new learning rate = 0.002503440897424549
epoch 28: valid acc = 0.184, new learning rate = 0.0023782688525533216
epoch 29: valid acc = 0.18, new learning rate = 0.0022593554099256553
epoch 30: valid acc = 0.182, new learning rate = 0.0021463876394293723
TODO: Edit RMSpropOptim in ./ecbm4040/optimizers.py
from ecbm4040.optimizers import RMSpropOptim
model = MLP(input_dim=3072, hidden_dims=[100, 100], num_classes=10, l2_reg=0.0, weight_scale=1e-3)
optimizer = RMSpropOptim(model)
hist_rmsprop = optimizer.train(model, X_train, y_train, X_val, y_val,
num_epoch=30, batch_size=200, learning_rate=1e-5,
learning_decay=0.95, verbose=False, record_interval=1)number of batches for training: 10
epoch 1: valid acc = 0.128, new learning rate = 9.5e-06
epoch 2: valid acc = 0.126, new learning rate = 9.025e-06
epoch 3: valid acc = 0.124, new learning rate = 8.57375e-06
epoch 4: valid acc = 0.112, new learning rate = 8.1450625e-06
epoch 5: valid acc = 0.118, new learning rate = 7.737809375e-06
epoch 6: valid acc = 0.122, new learning rate = 7.35091890625e-06
epoch 7: valid acc = 0.122, new learning rate = 6.9833729609374995e-06
epoch 8: valid acc = 0.124, new learning rate = 6.634204312890624e-06
epoch 9: valid acc = 0.124, new learning rate = 6.302494097246093e-06
epoch 10: valid acc = 0.126, new learning rate = 5.9873693923837885e-06
epoch 11: valid acc = 0.16, new learning rate = 5.688000922764599e-06
epoch 12: valid acc = 0.16, new learning rate = 5.403600876626369e-06
epoch 13: valid acc = 0.16, new learning rate = 5.13342083279505e-06
epoch 14: valid acc = 0.162, new learning rate = 4.876749791155297e-06
epoch 15: valid acc = 0.162, new learning rate = 4.6329123015975315e-06
epoch 16: valid acc = 0.162, new learning rate = 4.401266686517655e-06
epoch 17: valid acc = 0.164, new learning rate = 4.181203352191772e-06
epoch 18: valid acc = 0.164, new learning rate = 3.972143184582183e-06
epoch 19: valid acc = 0.164, new learning rate = 3.773536025353074e-06
epoch 20: valid acc = 0.164, new learning rate = 3.58485922408542e-06
epoch 21: valid acc = 0.164, new learning rate = 3.405616262881149e-06
epoch 22: valid acc = 0.162, new learning rate = 3.2353354497370914e-06
epoch 23: valid acc = 0.164, new learning rate = 3.0735686772502367e-06
epoch 24: valid acc = 0.164, new learning rate = 2.9198902433877247e-06
epoch 25: valid acc = 0.164, new learning rate = 2.7738957312183385e-06
epoch 26: valid acc = 0.164, new learning rate = 2.6352009446574215e-06
epoch 27: valid acc = 0.164, new learning rate = 2.5034408974245503e-06
epoch 28: valid acc = 0.164, new learning rate = 2.378268852553323e-06
epoch 29: valid acc = 0.164, new learning rate = 2.2593554099256565e-06
epoch 30: valid acc = 0.162, new learning rate = 2.1463876394293738e-06
TODO: Edit AdamOptim in ./ecbm4040/optimizers.py
from ecbm4040.optimizers import AdamOptim
model = MLP(input_dim=3072, hidden_dims=[100, 100], num_classes=10, l2_reg=0.0, weight_scale=1e-3)
optimizer = AdamOptim(model)
hist_adam = optimizer.train(model, X_train, y_train, X_val, y_val,
num_epoch=30, batch_size=200, learning_rate=1e-3,
learning_decay=0.95, verbose=False, record_interval=1)number of batches for training: 10
epoch 1: valid acc = 0.13, new learning rate = 0.00095
epoch 2: valid acc = 0.12, new learning rate = 0.0009025
epoch 3: valid acc = 0.134, new learning rate = 0.000857375
epoch 4: valid acc = 0.176, new learning rate = 0.0008145062499999999
epoch 5: valid acc = 0.208, new learning rate = 0.0007737809374999998
epoch 6: valid acc = 0.256, new learning rate = 0.0007350918906249997
epoch 7: valid acc = 0.256, new learning rate = 0.0006983372960937497
epoch 8: valid acc = 0.264, new learning rate = 0.0006634204312890621
epoch 9: valid acc = 0.292, new learning rate = 0.000630249409724609
epoch 10: valid acc = 0.306, new learning rate = 0.0005987369392383785
epoch 11: valid acc = 0.344, new learning rate = 0.0005688000922764595
epoch 12: valid acc = 0.318, new learning rate = 0.0005403600876626365
epoch 13: valid acc = 0.336, new learning rate = 0.0005133420832795047
epoch 14: valid acc = 0.33, new learning rate = 0.00048767497911552944
epoch 15: valid acc = 0.324, new learning rate = 0.00046329123015975297
epoch 16: valid acc = 0.362, new learning rate = 0.0004401266686517653
epoch 17: valid acc = 0.356, new learning rate = 0.00041812033521917703
epoch 18: valid acc = 0.37, new learning rate = 0.00039721431845821814
epoch 19: valid acc = 0.336, new learning rate = 0.0003773536025353072
epoch 20: valid acc = 0.358, new learning rate = 0.0003584859224085418
epoch 21: valid acc = 0.368, new learning rate = 0.0003405616262881147
epoch 22: valid acc = 0.368, new learning rate = 0.00032353354497370894
epoch 23: valid acc = 0.366, new learning rate = 0.00030735686772502346
epoch 24: valid acc = 0.384, new learning rate = 0.00029198902433877225
epoch 25: valid acc = 0.35, new learning rate = 0.00027738957312183364
epoch 26: valid acc = 0.358, new learning rate = 0.0002635200944657419
epoch 27: valid acc = 0.388, new learning rate = 0.0002503440897424548
epoch 28: valid acc = 0.398, new learning rate = 0.00023782688525533205
epoch 29: valid acc = 0.396, new learning rate = 0.00022593554099256544
epoch 30: valid acc = 0.392, new learning rate = 0.00021463876394293716
TODO: Run the following cells, which plot the loss curves of different optimizers.
loss_hist_sgd, train_acc_hist_sgd, val_acc_hist_sgd = hist_sgd
loss_hist_momentum, train_acc_hist_momentum, val_acc_hist_momentum = hist_sgd_momentum
loss_hist_rmsprop, train_acc_hist_rmsprop, val_acc_hist_rmsprop = hist_rmsprop
loss_hist_adam, train_acc_hist_adam, val_acc_hist_adam = hist_adam# Plot training error curve of optimizers
plt.plot(loss_hist_sgd, label="sgd")
plt.plot(loss_hist_momentum, label="momentum")
plt.plot(loss_hist_rmsprop, label="rmsprop")
plt.plot(loss_hist_adam, label="adam")
plt.legend()
plt.show()
# Plot training accuracy curve of optimizers
plt.plot(train_acc_hist_sgd, label="sgd")
plt.plot(train_acc_hist_momentum, label="momentum")
plt.plot(train_acc_hist_rmsprop, label="rmsprop")
plt.plot(train_acc_hist_adam, label="adam")
plt.legend()
plt.show()
# Plot validation accuracy curve of optimizers
plt.plot(val_acc_hist_sgd, label="sgd")
plt.plot(val_acc_hist_momentum, label="momentum")
plt.plot(val_acc_hist_rmsprop, label="rmsprop")
plt.plot(val_acc_hist_adam, label="adam")
plt.legend()
plt.show()
TODO: Describe your results, and discuss your understandings of these optimizers, such as their advantages/disadvantages and when to use them.
Answer: Adam has the best performance among all in this experiment. Does it mean Adam is better than the others? No. Adam makes it easy to converge quickly on the first try, finding a sharp local minima. SGD tends to converge to flat local minima. With momentum, this issue can be greatly resolved and we can get a much faster convergence. In reality, SGD momentum is often used as the state of the art optimizer but its parameters require more tunning.
React
Typescript
Django
Laravel
Facebook
Microsoft
Google
Alibaba
D3
Tencent