How can DeepVirFinder ensure the accuracy of long contig predictions? about deepvirfinder

[jessieren]

Thanks for your interest in using DeepVirFinder.

DeepVirFinder trained a few models for predicting contigs of different lengths. As we stated in the paper, “we use the model trained by 150 bp sequences for predicting any sequences <300 bp. Similarily, we used the model trained by 300 bp sequences for predicting sequences of the length 300– 500 bp, the model trained by 500 bp sequences for predicting 500–1000 bp sequences, and the 1000 bp model to predict sequences >1000 bp.” See Figure 2B.

For contig > 3000 bp, the sequence will be predicted using the 1000 bp model. The whole sequence will be fed into the convolutional and max pooling layers without truncation or abandoning part of the sequence. As shown in Figure 2A, the longer the sequence, the higher the prediction accuracy.

Hope that helps.

[444thLiao]

Dear author, I also have concerns about that issue.
What I want to do is predicting the phage/prophage from the assembled genome sequences. Thus generally we need to apply it in some very long contigs which could be over 10Kbp. How does this software perform in this situation which is far more larger than the fig2A shown.

Should I smash it into the shorter genomic sequence for better prediction since it could also directly predict the exact positions on the genome.

Any suggestions for that?

Thanks~