Comments (3)
@arieljames -- please let me know if you still want me to do these comparisons, or if you are now planning on doing all of this group yourself. Either is fine with me.
from 219-2021-eyetracking-analysis.
PS You can just reassign any tasks you plan on doing yourself to yourself.
from 219-2021-eyetracking-analysis.
I will assign myself to comparing with in-lab data, but I'll let you do the power analysis (unless you want me to. I have an old script I can dust off that's for doing simulation-based power analyses for multi-level MEMs).
I will post data for you to run the power analysis soon. The hold-up is that "the data" could mean a few different things, and the power analysis depends on what model(s) we're going to run. This is why I wanted to get folks to weigh in. For my in-lab data, I'm set up to take all Ps' eye-tracking files and crank them through some Matlab scripts where certain things get decided (like the time window and whether or not pre-window fixations count) and then a nice usable dataset comes out. As I'm typing this, I'm thinking that I can set things up in Matlab to give us more flexibility with whatever gets spit out, but those decisions will need to be made at some point regardless. I can't tell if I'm making sense.
from 219-2021-eyetracking-analysis.
Related Issues (20)
- Group C write-up: Strength of results compared to behavioral data HOT 2
- Group D write-up: Strength of results in comparison to behavioral data
- Group B: Basic methods and results
- Group B: Comparison to calibration data
- Group B: Comparison to in-lab data??
- Group B: Strength of results compared to behavioral data
- Group E: Basic methods and results HOT 3
- Group E: Comparison to in-lab data??
- Group E: Comparison to calibration data
- Group E: Strength of results compared to behavioral data
- New data collection? HOT 5
- Is there a long lag time? HOT 4
- Why were these subjects excluded? HOT 1
- Sample rate question HOT 1
- Group E: Where is the norming data? HOT 1
- calibration data questions HOT 1
- Improvements to webgazer.js
- How was number of subjects determined HOT 1
- Selection of studies HOT 1
- Title & author list HOT 2
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from 219-2021-eyetracking-analysis.