219-2021-eyetracking-analysis's Introduction
219-2021-eyetracking-analysis's People
219-2021-eyetracking-analysis's Issues
Group B: Comparison to calibration data
Group A write-up: Comparison to in-lab data
Do we have any??
Why were these subjects excluded?
Group-E:
all.data <- all.data %>% filter(subject_id!="603ea6a51c38def3e4140ba6" & subject_id!="5ce1372c55fe0d001869c8d8" & subject_id!="5f47d860b56e68220cb86be1" & subject_id!="607eaf87ac02229ef4fa8f4a" & subject_id!="5d30857eb2f0ad00163470f3" & subject_id!="5e272684f205790453c2c4b8" & subject_id!="5f5b5881b17fa72756b8ff2a" & subject_id!="5fae5291ec402509e2885604")
Sample rate question
@jodeleeuw -- is sample rate for data collection determined by jsPsych? WebGazer? The camera? (I mean, there's the sampling rate of the camera, but I mean who decides how often data stamps occur?)
Group C write-up: Comparison to calibration data
Improvements to webgazer.js
You'll find a 'FUBAR' in "General Methods". You made some improvements to webgazer.js to improve timing, and I think we should mention those here. Possibly referencing the issues that others have reported.
Group C write-up: Comparison to in-lab data??
Do we have in-lab data for this?
Selection of studies
I started some text on how the five studies were selected. Right now, it needs a description of the five studies. It might be nice to include info on number of citations (justifying why these studies and not others).
Group A write-up: Comparison to calibration data
Group C write-up: Strength of results compared to behavioral data
Group D write-up: Comparison to calibration data
Title & author list
Can we please decide a title and authorship list in the next week or two. I don't care what it is, but I do want to be able to cite this in my tenure materials when I submit at the end of the month!
Group B: Comparison to in-lab data??
Do we have any?
Compare replicability to calibration success
Group E: Where is the norming data?
@jodeleeuw the methods mention norming data, but I don't seem to have them?
New data collection?
Will we replicate any of the studies in the lab or online and, if so, which ones?
Will we run the posner task?
How was number of subjects determined
From "General Methods":
In order to have adequate statistical power and precision, we aimed for XXXX participants per experiment.
Group E: Comparison to calibration data
Group B: Basic methods and results
Group D write-up: Basic methods and results
Is there a long lag time?
Was talking with Jesse Snedeker yesterday. Her lab has been using Webgazer and finds the time stamps are delayed by about 300 ms. Apparently, they followed this up by actually running Tobii data through it (??? not sure what she meant) and found the lag was still there, so she thinks it's about the way analysis is done.
Do we see anything like that? Would we know?
Group A write-up: Strength of results in comparison to behavioral data
Group B: Strength of results compared to behavioral data
calibration data questions
@raryskin @jodeleeuw @eforbes24
In looking at group c, I saw that calibration analyses focus on the "boost calibration" phase. Group e doesn't have that phase at all. A very small number of subjects went through "recalibration", but I'm not sure what that means. Was that immediately following the initial calibration if initial calibration wasn't good enough?
For now, I'm assuming that is the case, so it makes sense to use the second calibration score when there is one.
Group E: Strength of results compared to behavioral data
Group E: Comparison to in-lab data??
Do we have any??
Group C write-up: Basic methods and results
Group E: Basic methods and results
Group D write-up: Comparison to in-lab data
Group A write-up: Basic methods and results
Initial write-up
Group D write-up: Strength of results in comparison to behavioral data
Post Altmann & Kamide data for JKH to run power analysis
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
๐ Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐๐๐
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.