Is Aphrodite still actively maintained about aphrodite

[jlfwong]

FWIW, I don't personally do any active development on Aphrodite any more, but I also use it in https://github.com/jlfwong/speedscope, which is actively developed.

Can't speak for other owners/contributors, but I'm unlikely to add any significant contributions to Aphrodite going forward, but it's also not obvious that any significant changes are necessary for it to serve its purpose.

[jlfwong]

I just merged #382 since it looks like it's authored by a core contributor and was approved by a KA employee.

I'm happy to merge updates to flow typings as long as you're willing to own any issues that arise in response to the merge @Brianzchen. I haven't published this repo in a very long time, however, so I might prefer to leave that to someone else, and I'm not totally sure who the right person to do that is any more.

[epicfaace]

@jeresig ?

[drianoaz]

👀

[Brianzchen]

I too would also like to know. I've been using for lib forever and it's always been pretty stable, maybe it's a complete library.

I'd like to help maintain this project as I'm a huge fan if you need the help?

cc @lencioni

[Brianzchen]

@jlfwong Thanks so much for replying, didn't think I'd get a reply from a collaborator 😄

I get that super active maintenance of this lib probably isn't necessary. But my interest is really triggered by a few main reasons

• #382 This PR hasn't been merged despite having been approved and actually released last year
• And when I was exploring my node_modules/aphrodite as a flow user, the fact that this lib ships the flow config causes my flow sever to crash. Some healthy maintenance in what's published would be nice.
• I've recently added flow definitions to flow-typed. It would be nice to add them directly to this project given it's written with flow, but seems like there's no maintainers #391