GithubHelp home page GithubHelp logo

lenagroeger / news-nadsat Goto Github PK

View Code? Open in Web Editor NEW
1.0 3.0 0.0 177 KB

An inclusive dictionary of all the language, terms, guidelines and checklists that create a safe and encouraging environment for a diverse group of people in and out of the newsroom.

news-nadsat's Introduction

A Newsroom Nadsat: How to Build Better Newsrooms with Better Language

An inclusive dictionary of all the language, terms, guidelines and checklists that create a safe and encouraging environment for a diverse group of people in and out of the newsroom.

By Lena Groeger, ProPublica, @lenagroeger & Aurelia Moser, CartoDB, @auremoser

SRRCON Session: Etherpad: Live transcription:

1. Posting/Recruiting

Posting jobs or invitations to events can be challenging; horror stories are innumerable. DEFCON has an FAQ on their site where gender biased/insensitive language can be rampant, gamergate exposed us to a range of negative vocab on the internet and a population of anonymous people willing to propagate that drivel. How can we bandage this situation and adopt more sensitive language to welcome all parties to opportunities in journalism?

  • Language used in different job postings Be gender-neutral. Job description text should use gender-neutral language and make no assumptions or constructions about the gender identity or presentation of readers and potential applicants.
  • Language used when reaching out to people Make sure copy tone is friendly and accessible. Job descriptions in tech often take an aggressive tone or use inaccessible lingo not related to the work, which can alienate diverse applicants by suggesting a hyper-competitive work environment or “in-group”-driven culture. Words like “rockstar,” “hero,” “10x,” and “ninja” — all too common in the tech industry — should be replaced with more creative, descriptive (and less problematic!) words. s/he, they (used as singular), ze, address candidates by gender neutral job title or neutral pronouns to me, she/he reads a bit easier than s/he. Is there CP/AP/CMOS style on this? How about "You"? Makes it more personal, instead of talking in third person, also avoids gender identity issues
  • How to respond to emails (recruiter emails, notes) I have a strategy for responding to recruiters and making the situation mutually productive: even if you're not interested in the job, ask about an issue you care about so that they have to then return to their employer and develop a policy for answering/addressing those requests. I always ask about "what's your company's policy on providing transgender healthcare?"
Thanks for writing. What is the demographic makeup of the team at [company name]? Having a diverse company is very important to me. Does the company — and its leadership team — consist of people other then white and asian men? [Optional addition] Do you have a publicly available diversity report? Something like this? - http://www.google.com/diversity/at-google.html - https://www.apple.com/diversity/ I’d need to see one of those before we began any discussions.

We added this language to all Moz OpenNews ads:

"If you’re deeply interested in working on technical problems within journalism and have relevant skills and experience, please consider applying even if your background doesn’t perfectly match our ideal credentials. We are committed to diversity and especially encourage members of underrepresented communities to apply." But boiler plate language doesn't solve anything - it feels disconnected from the rest of the body. Pipeline issues are part of the issue. The org needs to work not that as well. There are groups to talk to with more diverse potential candidates. We also need to be more present in communities that don't currently see us as places to work. We can't just walk in and say "give us your best people." How do you talk to your HR dept about doing their job without doing their job? We created a database of people to contact to ask where we should put the ad to reach more diverse range of candidates, and everyone on the team took on responsibility for contacting people to ask that question.

Posting/Recruiting Links

http://www.hiremorewomenintech.com/ http://www.ere.net/2013/03/01/you-dont-know-it-but-women-see-gender-bias-in-your-job-postings/ https://storify.com/kissane/job-listings-that-don-t-alienate https://open.bufferapp.com/job-descriptions-diversity/ I used Textio, http://www.textio.com, in their beta phase to improve our job ads. I made several major changes based on its really smart interface. https://modelviewculture.com/issues/hiring

What We Want to Gather

  • Good/bad examples of EOE sentences/paragraphs at the ends of job postings
  • Sample job descriptions redlined — before-and-after versions — with exclusionary/inclusionary language — would be helpful.

2. Hiring/Interviews

"Most interviews are a waste of time because 99.4 percent of the time is spent trying to confirm whatever impression the interviewer formed in the first ten seconds." - Senior Vice President of People Operations at Google

As fair and impartial as we like to think we are, we are all subject to biases: we favor people who look and talk like us, we form quick impressions based on few facts, we hold implicit beliefs about large groups of people. Given these biases, how do we make sure all applicants for a job are treated fairly and assessed accurately? One way is to have structured interviews (not vastly open ended questions like "Tell me about yourself..." or trivia-dependent brainteasers like “How many golf balls would fit inside a 747?”

Let's come up with a set of guidelines for a good, inclusive, structured interview.

  • Interview process

    • All the same candidates should be asked the same questions, given the same assessments, etc. This makes it easier to compare candidates, and less likely the interview will just reflect the interviewer's personal liking of a candidate.
  • Who does the interview?

    • Should that person be consistent for every interview?
  • Good Interview questions:

    • Tell me about a time your behavior had a positive impact on your team. (Follow-ups: What was your primary goal and why? How did your teammates respond? Moving forward, what’s your plan?)
    • Tell me about a time when you effectively managed your team to achieve a goal. What did your approach look like? (Follow-ups: What were your targets and how did you meet them as an individual and as a team? How did you adapt your leadership approach to different individuals? What was the key takeaway from this specific situation?)
    • Tell me about a time you had difficulty working with someone (can be a coworker, classmate, client). What made this person difficult to work with for you? (Follow-ups: What steps did you take to resolve the problem? What was the outcome? What could you have done differently?)
  • Use interviews as a place to discuss workplace benefits

    • Specifically advertise company benefits that are supportive of diverse workers. flexible work hours, remote working, childcare assistance, family-inclusive company events, accessible facilities and workplace environments, mental health care coverage, vacation time, mentoring and training opportunities, trans-inclusive health care and parental leave
  • Make sure interviewers are well-versed in what is and isn't ok to ask during an interview for legal reasons. Here's a good resource

  • Actively call out interest in diverse applicants. Expressing your company’s explicit interest and commitment to hiring diverse applicants helps communicate that building diverse teams is a priority for your company.

Hiring/Interviews Links

3. Workplace/Conferences

Code of Conduct policies are pretty important at most events these days, and understanding how to manage, encourage and build a diverse team is an important part of maintaining healthy and welcoming work environments.

Things to consider:

  • Potential consequences for breaching the Code of Conduct
  • "Take care of each other"
  • Code of Conduct written in humanspeak
  • Management/Perils of flat structure/Maintaining integrity and accountability

Code of Conduct Links

State code of conduct explicitly up front, in a speech at the beginning of the event. Make consequences clear.

Have things more written/explicit version transmitted orally/implicit. Make it fair to everyone. Consider speaking styles and what might be left unsaid or assumed.

There are ways to exclude people and make them feel unwelcome — especially new people — even if it's not discrimination against a protected class — is crappy, too. Think about inclusion more generally. How do you treat people? Thing about the idea of taking care of people.

4. Content/Work/Stories

When thinking about writing/creating inclusive stories, it is important to think about the processes (the checklists, the written standards and protocols) that happen before publication. Many of you may be familiar with the Grantland story about Dr. V, which outed a transexual person who eventually committed suicide before the story was published. http://grantland.com/features/what-grantland-got-wrong/

Would things have turned out differently if there had been a standard process in place (a checklist for who to consult, or list of Q’s to ask when writing about LGBT or other populations, for example?) It certainly could not have hurt. Let's brainstorm the sorts of things you would want to include in this process.

Potential Topics:

  • process for making sure diversity is reflected in published work (checklist, what Q’s to ask)
  • who to consult before you publish (an established practice for who to consult with)
  • what examples you pick to be in your story
  • photographs/iconography/symbolism (using male icon for individual persons)
  • color: what colors to represent diff cultures, should gender be blue/pink?
  • accessibility/Universal design (i.e. picking colors for color blind people) http://ablersite.org/

One example

Nick Kristof doesn't include a female voice in his recent piece on poverty. It doesn't automatically make it a bad piece, but how do you tactfully critique the lack of relevant voices?

Some Tips

  • Consider at the beginning of reporting a piece reaching out to wider communities. related: starting broadly when you're reporting/looking for sources -- casting a wide net of sources in the beginning can affect how your story goes forward re: diversity

  • Start measuring the voices in your publication (census of your ancedotes!) Know what type of sources you're using. Yes, you're on deadline, you need to get a story done and you need a compelling voice, but if you look at the results year over year, you can see if all of these things drives you back to literally the same sources over and over again.

  • Come to people with tools and suggestions. It's easy for folks to get defensive when you bring up the lack of diversity/voices in a story, so come prepared with solutions. Instead of pointing out examples of stories that lack diversity, give people tools and techniques that might help them on their next story. Example: cast the widest net possible when gathering sources at the very beginning of the reporting process, use [databases to find diverse sources] (http://www.embo.org/science-policy/women-in-science/wils-database-of-women-in-life-sciences) Frame conversation as "here are some techniques to get better sources/do better reporting" not, "this is what was problematic in your story" Look to the future, not rehash past missteps.

Other Thoughts

Demographics of your reporting/editing staff will affect the demographics of your sources. Diverse backgrounds—gender, race, ethnicity, region, class, age—also broaden newsroom discussion in valuable ways. Wonder: Are specific stories being funneled to reporters of color or gender? Benefits: You can have a member of the community covering it You have access to the expertise of someone in the community Members of the community may be more open to someone from the same community. Cons: Pigeon-holing, stereotyping Are we making someone in the newsroom the "token" representative for a certain minority? Representing the community as a burden

RESOURCES

What to do:

What not to do:

References:

Moving Forward

We want to make a simple site for persistent reference, what might that site look like?

news-nadsat's People

Contributors

lenagroeger avatar auremoser avatar

Stargazers

Jonathan Stegall avatar

Watchers

James Cloos avatar  avatar  avatar

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.