Comments (5)
Interestingly, codegen is happy when you coerce the array to a local variable:
https://godbolt.org/z/rjePzW9KW
from llvm-mos.
A possibly more useful stack dump:
fatal error: error in backend: unable to translate instruction: call (in function: main)
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script.
Stack dump:
0. Program arguments: /opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang++ -gdwarf-4 -g -o /app/output.s -S -fno-lto -mllvm -zp-avail=224 -fcolor-diagnostics -fno-crash-diagnostics -Os <source>
1. <eof> parser at end of file
2. Code generation
3. Running pass 'Function Pass Manager' on module '<source>'.
4. Running pass 'IRTranslator' on function '@main'
#0 0x000057c33ba706bb llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x15396bb)
#1 0x000057c33ba6eeed llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x1537eed)
#2 0x000057c33ba1f657 (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x14e8657)
#3 0x000057c33ba1f927 (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x14e8927)
#4 0x000057c33ba6bc07 llvm::sys::Process::Exit(int, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x1534c07)
#5 0x000057c33b33f117 (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0xe08117)
#6 0x000057c33ba2267f llvm::report_fatal_error(llvm::Twine const&, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x14eb67f)
#7 0x000057c33c1d1f03 (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x1c9af03)
#8 0x000057c33c1e32e8 llvm::IRTranslator::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x1cac2e8)
#9 0x000057c33b543c6c (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x100cc6c)
#10 0x000057c33b7f15fe llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x12ba5fe)
#11 0x000057c33b7f176b llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x12ba76b)
#12 0x000057c33b7f1e5d llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x12bae5d)
#13 0x000057c33bb7fa45 clang::EmitBackendOutput(clang::DiagnosticsEngine&, clang::HeaderSearchOptions const&, clang::CodeGenOptions const&, clang::TargetOptions const&, clang::LangOptions const&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::Module*, clang::BackendAction, llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<llvm::vfs::FileSystem>, std::unique_ptr<llvm::raw_pwrite_stream, std::default_delete<llvm::raw_pwrite_stream>>, clang::BackendConsumer*) (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x1648a45)
#14 0x000057c33bee2672 clang::BackendConsumer::HandleTranslationUnit(clang::ASTContext&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x19ab672)
#15 0x000057c33cce203e clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x27ab03e)
#16 0x000057c33bee2720 clang::CodeGenAction::ExecuteAction() (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x19ab720)
#17 0x000057c33c0184cf clang::FrontendAction::Execute() (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x1ae14cf)
#18 0x000057c33bfd85b2 clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x1aa15b2)
#19 0x000057c33c085c29 clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x1b4ec29)
#20 0x000057c33b340395 cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0xe09395)
#21 0x000057c33b33c71f (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0xe0571f)
#22 0x000057c33bf04e2f (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x19cde2f)
#23 0x000057c33ba1f8f0 llvm::CrashRecoveryContext::RunSafely(llvm::function_ref<void ()>) (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x14e88f0)
#24 0x000057c33bf05799 (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x19ce799)
#25 0x000057c33bee6d96 clang::driver::Compilation::ExecuteCommand(clang::driver::Command const&, clang::driver::Command const*&, bool) const (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x19afd96)
#26 0x000057c33bee6eb7 clang::driver::Compilation::ExecuteJobs(clang::driver::JobList const&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<std::pair<int, clang::driver::Command const*>>&, bool) const (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x19afeb7)
#27 0x000057c33beefbdd clang::driver::Driver::ExecuteCompilation(clang::driver::Compilation&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<std::pair<int, clang::driver::Command const*>>&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0x19b8bdd)
#28 0x000057c33b33e64c clang_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0xe0764c)
#29 0x000057c33b1a91b1 main (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0xc721b1)
#30 0x000070934c429d90 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x29d90)
#31 0x000070934c429e40 __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x29e40)
#32 0x000057c33b33be6e _start (/opt/compiler-explorer/llvm-mos-trunk/bin/mos-c64-clang+++0xe04e6e)
mos-c64-clang++: error: clang frontend command failed with exit code 70 (use -v to see invocation)
Compiler returned: 70
from llvm-mos.
Interestingly, codegen is happy when you coerce the array to a local variable:
Yes, but doesn't resolve the problem because I need to write in the member variable. I'm stuck :-( . Any workaround? Is there a way to write this routine with an external assembler?
from llvm-mos.
The workaround is clearly not a fix. I'm a little confused as to why the workaround works at all. Meanwhile, you may be able to get by, by temporarily by copying a pointer to a member as I have done.
from llvm-mos.
I find it helpful when looking at inline asm like this to try to imagine what a human would try to emit if they were playing the role of the compiler. Here we have a member function, test
, which gets handed an implcit this
pointer. How could the compiler possible know what number to put in the assembly string for lda
? It would have to be some compile-time constant number or symbol that it can use with the absolute addressing mode, but the actual address would be different every time the function were called.
There was probably a reasoanbly good error message for this case generated internally, but we still haven't been able to surface it. I looked and we didn't have a good issue filed for that, so I made one to track it: #463
As far as this goes, it's probably WAI. If you to indirect through a runtime variable address in inline assembly, you'll need to put it in an imaginary pointer register using e.g. r
, then indirect through the pointer using an indirect addressing mode.
from llvm-mos.
Related Issues (20)
- LLVM ERROR: Unable to legalize instruction HOT 3
- Support assembler sources in ca65 format
- Lower mem intrinsics to loops
- G_OR prevents selection of addressing mode HOT 1
- Don't copy single-use strings to the zero page
- rustc crash HOT 2
- Compilation failure on MacOS w. Apple silicon HOT 11
- Builder for Apple Silicon
- mos-sim crash HOT 1
- Triple selection doesn't accommodate mos-<platform>-<type>-<subtype> syntax
- [65C816, 65CE02] Long branch instructions not supported HOT 2
- ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __rc4 to __rc24 HOT 3
- Missing G_SBC commutation for equality checks HOT 1
- [Assembler] Improved ergonomics for 65816 (and other) subtargets HOT 14
- [Assembler] .byte/.short don't support MOS expression parsing
- [Interrupts] Current interrupt C generation inadequate for CBM machines HOT 2
- Redundant copy and spilling HOT 1
- Declaration order of member variables has a big impact on code optimization HOT 1
- Surface error messages for inline assembly
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from llvm-mos.