markdegrootnl / dockerfiles Goto Github PK

Hi, I noticed that the docker image for unifi protect arm64 got an update. Will x86 also be getting an update? (If it's available for x86)

Docker log output:

database exists
Error: Config owner (postgres:101) and data owner (root:0) do not match, and config owner is not root

Then I deleted and re-created the container and now the logs it's like:

Is it related to user permissions on the volumes?

Edit: I got it working if I don't link the postgres database to a volume :/

Edit2:
To fix my main issue: Instead of linking the volume to /var/lib/postgresql/10/main, just link to /var/lib/postgresql and the permissions will be fixed on the first start.

Other issue that will show up later if you just use the port mapping is that the docker need to have external internet access, (tip from https://github.com/iamjamestl/docker-unifi-protect ), so maybe it's better to just use a bridge mode on the container.
So if you get a blue screen saying something like connecting to your nvr..., it's the port mapping issue.

Hi, I will take a deeper look about what's causing this but I wanted to share here in case somebody else also face the same issue.

Yesterday I noticed that my NAS that contains my local DNS server and Unifi Protect running on it was receiving internet but wasn't being able to serve DNS. When I openend the docker containers I noticed that all of my RAM was being used by the Unifi Protect. As soon as I restarted the docker container, it started using just a little of RAM and the DNS server started working as usual.

I thought that was a random issue after running it for more than 2months non-stop so it was nothing to worry about.

Today I went to check the docker images and I found this:

So apparently there's a memory leak somewhere.

Thanks for the hard work, I managed to set it up with this tutorial and try out the interface, Nice!

Any chance / plans to get newer releases made available? e.g. last one from dec v1.3.35 UNVR or 2.0.24 CKGen2+?

I understand that Ubiquiti could throw a spanner in the way, hoping they won't or even change their mind to support it, especially for home users to help decide purchasing their cameras to use with their software, as an easy and attractive migration coming from using Google/Nest!