nekromoff / arrogance-of-space Goto Github PK

sometimes, the tool is used to analyze plannings like this, based on digital maps.pdf from cities (partly as vector.pdf). So the image colors there are defined exactly and could be preselected by color of background image. So the block sizes can be chosen smaller and the result is more accurate and quicker.

and display it on the exported image.

"I actually first tried to use it on my iPad but strangely I could touch only one tile at the time with my Apple Pencil (it works best with a computer)"

Mostly, the tool is used to analyze Transport spaces. So the allocation there would be interesting, too (without Green and Buildings).
example, where these values were calculated manually.

I used this tool for a street in my neighbourhood. I took a few meters and painted them red and blue. The created image says: Cars (24%) Pedestrians (15%). What about the rest?

If I paint all the rest black, the result is Cars (11%) Pedestrians (7%) Dead space (82%).

So the must be an issue with unpainted areas! In my opinion, they should either be ignored, so the result for the first image should be Cars (62%) Pedestrians (38%). Or they should be handled as dead space, and the result would be the same as in the second example.

But then should we also add cycling crossing tool?

https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/spatial-statistics/h-whyhexagons.htm

From the proof of concept to cleaner, better structured code.

Each circle represents one person (in a car, on a bike, a pedestrian etc.). Circles will have darker colors in each category.