Outside as safe cells about kaboom

[pwmarcz]

Good point, I haven't thought about ever *forcing* the player to play elsewhere because it's safe. I am worried it would make the rules more complicated, though, and it's on the side of punishing the player. The current implementation will, of course, allow you to play outside in this case.

…

On Fri, 27 Dec 2019, 18:47 837951602, ***@***.***> wrote: [image: pic] <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/24836316/71526864-c08ffa00-2913-11ea-84b8-13e1a432ff67.png> Here outside is safe, but it still allows to guess Not hard to fix I guess — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#13?email_source=notifications&email_token=AADSMD2W7AIY7VX4EGDPHRTQ2Y5TFA5CNFSM4J77T7X2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4IC4V6SQ>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADSMD3PJ2TTLRYFOA7DHK3Q2Y5TFANCNFSM4J77T7XQ> .

[837951602]

(one that easily created) and
(one that may appear in real game) won't need any guess, so allowing guess is against the "cruel but fair" spirit.

In't it just add

if there is outside and outside is safe, then there is safe

?

[837951602]

and I actually meet it

[kaymes]

I actually met this situation in real game play a few times and was just about to report it as a bug.

[meeque]

Isn't counting remaining mines a standard endgame strategy?

I do not think that fixing this bug "would make the rules more complicated". The rules say:
"If you try to guess, the game will always choose the worst scenario. Except when you are forced to guess"

In the examples given above, you're clearly not forced to guess. Some of the non-adjacent fields are definitely safe. So revealing an adjacent field should be punished;)

Sorry, for smart-assing. Unfortunately, I have no idea how to fix this.

[837951602]

If someone didn't see: Before, in this case, you're still required to click on border, clicking somewhere else is broken (#10).