qiyuangong / leetcode Goto Github PK

I have tried the solution of Leetcode 146, and it shows wrong answer?

[ ] Upgrade from Python 2 to Python3

I have this problem can you solve this. If you can please tell me the pseudocode or algorithm, please.

if len(linklist)<n there is error

I believe including question itself as comment in the solution code will be good...

I tried to run this code in python 3, and the result is not correct.
since the default number structure is float in python 3, I changed the code as bellow:
`class Solution(object):
def isPalindrome(self, x):
if x < 0:
return False
ls = len(str(x))
tmp = x
print((int(ls/2)))
for i in range(int(ls/2)):
right = int(tmp % 10)
left = tmp / (10 ** (ls - 2 * i - 1))
left = int(left % 10)
print (left, right)
if left != right:
return False
tmp = tmp // 10
return True

if name == 'main':
# begin
s = Solution()
print (s.isPalindrome(10000100001))`

Thank you.

TypeError: 'float' object cannot be interpreted as an integer

Hello, I watched that there is a short explanation of various problems through readme.
In this regard, it would be better if repository users could distinguish the problem by algorithm.
Therefore, I would like to add the problem classification according to the algorithm to readme.
Is it okay to add this classification function?

Could you please also add my LeetCode solutions repo in the other leetcode section.

Have a look at it over here: leetcode-algorithms

It contains solutions in java and python and also video descriptions of the algorithm.

Hi, I just check a code for Q7. Reverse Integer and it gives wrong answer in the test case.

So, Can I make some changes in this code?

And, In old codes there are some test case code in main.
Can I update this code by erasing?

It's shows wrong answer
Wrong Answer
Runtime: 36 ms

Hi, I noticed that the current solution for 007_Reverse_Integer.py is using string. I am wondering if it is possible that we also add a bitwise method (basically checking if the last bit is 1, and shift the binary string << 1 every time), which could be more proper here. I can add this method if that is ok.