Prod Mode about seamless-immutable

[alanhogan]

sounds legit

[diegovilar]

Agreed. Those constraints are mostly not supposed to be runtime errors and should be catch in development.

[crudh]

I'm interested in working on this but I am a bit unsure on how to pass the flag to the library?

Would you use the export code:

  if (typeof module === "object") {
    module.exports = Immutable;
  } else if (typeof exports === "object") {
    exports.Immutable = Immutable;
  } else if (typeof window === "object") {
    window.Immutable = Immutable;
  } else if (typeof global === "object") {
    global.Immutable = Immutable;
  }

To do different things depending on the environment, like (using global and window as examples):

  var prodMode = false;

  if (typeof module === "object") {
    module.exports = Immutable;
  } else if (typeof exports === "object") {
    exports.Immutable = Immutable;
  } else if (typeof window === "object") {
    window.Immutable = Immutable;
    prodMode = window.SEAMLESS_PROD_MODE === true;
  } else if (typeof global === "object") {
    global.Immutable = Immutable;
    prodMode = global.SEAMLESS_PROD_MODE === true;
  }

Or is there a better way?

[RangerMauve]

What about a method on Immutable that looks like Immutable.setProduction(true/false), and then have people explicitly enable it and define their own way of detecting production mode?

[rtfeldman]

Awsesome!

The best practice I've seen (which is what React does) is to make it envify-friendly.

Basically you do this:

if (process.env.NODE_ENV === "development") {
  // do some stuff we wouldn't do in prod mode
}

...then run envify on it twice, once with {NODE_ENV: "development"} and once with {NODE_ENV: "production"} to get two output files: seamless-immutable.development.js and seamless-immutable.production.min.js

In the development build, envify will replace the above with this:

if ("development" === "development") {
  // do some stuff we wouldn't do in prod mode
}

....whereas in the production build, it will instead replace it with this:

if ("production" === "development") {
  // do some stuff we wouldn't do in prod mode
}

Uglify will then see that this conditional will always fail and will strip this code out entirely, meaning the production build will not only avoid adding the extra attributes, it won't even run any conditionals to tell if it's in prod mode!

This implicitly means we'd need to introduce a build process to generate the two different files for library consumers.

[alanhogan]

I've been wondering about how to do this kind of thing for ever. Very nice solution. No non-JS syntax needed.

Alan

On Mar 19, 2015, at 2:27 PM, Richard Feldman [email protected] wrote:

Awsesome!

The best practice I've seen (which is what React does) is to make it envify-friendly.

Basically you do this:

if (process.env.NODE_ENV === "development") {
// do some stuff we wouldn't do in prod mode
}
...then run envify on it twice, once with {NODE_ENV: "development"} and once with {NODE_ENV: "production"} to get two output files: seamless-immutable.development.js and seamless-immutable.production.min.js

In the development build, envify will replace the above with this:

if ("development" === "development") {
// do some stuff we wouldn't do in prod mode
}
....whereas in the production build, it will instead replace it with this:

if ("production" === "development") {
// do some stuff we wouldn't do in prod mode
}
Uglify will then see that this conditional will always fail and will strip this code out entirely, meaning the production build will not only avoid adding the extra attributes, it won't even run any conditionals to tell if it's in prod mode!

This implicitly means we'd need to introduce a build process to generate the two different files for library consumers.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[crudh]

Should we then move seamless-immutable.js to a src directory to indicate that it shouldn't be used directly? And place the output files of envify in the root?

[rtfeldman]

That makes sense to me. Let's not check in changes to the compiled files on every commit, though, as that will make the diffs miserable.

Instead just leave them out of normal commits, and once per release I'll include updated compiled files in the commit that bumps the version number.

Sound good?

[crudh]

Sounds good!