First step towards submitting a SIP about sips

[jcnelson]

@radicleart Do we have a way to consistently tag SIPs with the consideration boards they pertain to or that the author maybe provides as an opener - "technical," "economic," "governance" etc - is it possible e.g. to build a filter for this maybe via an external system?

Why not just tag them with github tags? Then, each CAB member can just filter PRs by their respective tag.

[Hero-Gamer]

The README should provide a reasonable first step in the process of submitting a SIP, such as suggesting starting by posting a new issue here with an initial proposal for the SIP.

SIP 000 provides an high-level overview of the SIP process but not a practical first step. The SIPS README in the sips directory suggests that New SIPs may be submitted via pull request. Having to submit a pull request as a first step sets the bar high for engaging with the SIP process, which @GinaAbrams argues in issue #73 already has a high barrier to entry for folks that don't use GitHub day in and day out.

Posting a brief proposal for a new SIP in the issue tracker will lower the barrier to entry and open for further onboarding and hand-holding (if required).

Hi @njordhov, I agree with you. And you can see my comments in Gina's thread as well.

• There should be simpler process to pitch in your SIP ideas & SIP proposals.

• I've recently submitted a Residency for SIP under Stacks Foundation. And I plan to tackle exactly the type of thing you mentioned above.

• If I am lucky enough to be a SIP Resident, I will be facilitating the SIP proposal process and clarify & update the documentations accordingly, plus gathering valuable feedback like yours.

This Friday 11am EST, there is a SIP Community call, anybody is welcome to join and voice your comments. Please join us!

Here you can add this weekly SIP chat to your Google (or others) calendar: https://community.stacks.org/events#event=72322254;instance=20220701110000?popup=1

Let me know anything else you feel the process need to improve!

[njordhov]

There should be a process in place to handle incoming SIP proposals on the issue tracker, such as having a SIP editor respond to the proposal in a timely manner.

[radicleart]

Do we have a way to consistently tag SIPs with the consideration boards they pertain to or that the author maybe provides as an opener - "technical," "economic," "governance" etc - is it possible e.g. to build a filter for this maybe via an external system?

[njordhov]

For brief SIP proposals posted in the issue tracker, the responding editor could use github's tagging system to suggest a classification, making it listed as a card on the matching project table.

[njordhov]

Per today's weekly SIP call, a very first step should be announcing the proposed SIP in a new #sip channel on the Stacks discord messaging system.