Include in quicklisp about one-more-re-nightmare

[no-defun-allowed]

Can do, though I'd really like to use a POSIX ERE parser instead of this ad-hoc syntax before any "release" of any form. On the other hand, POSIX does not specify syntax for RE conjunction or negation. So I guess I'll have to roll forward with the current syntax for a while.

[no-defun-allowed]

I've made the request: quicklisp/quicklisp-projects#2142

[justinmeiners]

I think most users of CL-PPCRE use the custom s-expression syntax rather than perl strings. I think nobody will complain if you only have your own s-expressions.

Btw im interested in your project because it looks like its the only Lisp implementation that actually generates DFAs.

[no-defun-allowed]

Looks like it's in the new dist.