Why are bidi categories of Arabic-indic & Eastern Arabic numbers different? about alreq

[duerst]

As far as I remember, the difference in bidi category between Arabic-Indic digits and Eastern Arabic-Indic digits is due to the difference in bidi behavior desired in Arabic vs. Persian. Details should be available from Unicode.

[ntounsi]

http://unicode.org/reports/tr9/#AN
Section : 3.2 Bidirectional Character Types
"[...]

• As of Unicode 4.0, the Bidirectional Character Types of a few Indic characters were altered so that the Bidirectional Algorithm preserves canonical equivalence. That is, two canonically equivalent strings will result in equivalent ordering after applying the algorithm."

I guess the "few Indic characters" are the Eastern Arabic-Indic digits in range U+06F0..U+06F9, which are classified "European Number" vs "Arabic numbers".
I wonder what is the "canonical equivalence" problem in question. Didn't find more details.

[khaledhosny]

I think it is referring to characters used for Indic languages, not the Arabic-Indic digits which AFAIK had this distinction from the start.

[ebraminio]

@shervinafshar and I had a discussion about this years ago here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/persian-computing/602gqTIrlPQ because I found Arabic-Indic Extended to suit better for our use on a special case (but maybe is better on other cases).

I remember @roozbehp (which I guess won't get pinged by my mentioning here), somewhere on a very old mailing list discussion, something like 2001(?), wrote he was explaining to a developer why these are different, so if my memory on this is correct, perhaps he would be a good person to ask about the reason of the difference.