URL test data: expected query and fragment should have no leading ?/# about wpt

[rubys]

I'm OK with this change

[annevk]

@domenic @jasnell what do you think? Making urltestdata.json reflect URL records might be somewhat better than having it reflect the JavaScript API.

[annevk]

(That might also make it easier to omit fields that have their default value?)

[domenic]

Strong -1 from me. Being able to do simple assert_equals against the public API is what makes this a valuable way of testing the public API. If we start reconstructing the expected values from the JSON plus added test-specific logic, that'd be a big step backward to the old days where urltestdata just contained URL strings and the tests had to have their own mini-parser to reconstruct the expected values.

[annevk]

Okay, not a hill I'm dying on.