Feature Request: Add new `generic_jsonl` parser to support ingesting JSONL about archivebox

[jimwins]

Yeah, now that I play around with it we do need it to be a distinct parser because a single-line JSONL is a valid JSON file but not in the format that the generic_json parser expects. The two parsers can share code for turning each JSON object into a Link so that doesn't get duplicated, at least.

[pirate]

Maybe we can do it as a separate parser? generic_jsonl

I think making the parsers more narrow and explicit and having more of them is likely a better approach going forward to avoid the issues we've had in the past with trying to cram a bunch of workaround behaviors into a single parser.

[pirate]

Closing as completed, thanks @jimwins!