Better terminal logs about protobuf-es

[timostamm]

Hey Ariel, we're working on a version 2 that doesn't use classes (see pre-release here). This should help you in your case.

Logging the JSON representation still seems like a good idea to me. It really depends on your use case. If you want to redact specific fields from your logs, you'll also be able to use custom options with v2 to implement a filter. For example, you could mark fields that you do not want to show up in logs like this:

syntax = "proto3";

import "google/protobuf/descriptor.proto";

message Person {
  string name = 1;
  int32 id = 2;
  string email = 3 [(redacted) = true]; // don't include in logs
}

// custom field option 
extend google.protobuf.FieldOptions {
  optional bool redacted = 1024;
}

It's a unique feature of Protobuf that can be very useful for cases like this.

[ArielGueta]

We are working on a JS sdk based on this. Should we wait for v2?

[timostamm]

You could start using v2 today (the main APIs are fairly stable and feature complete), but you wouldn't want to ship with a dependency on a v2 pre-release version.

We can't commit on a release date yet, but I'd be extremely bummed if we didn't cut a stable release within the next couple of weeks or worst case next couple of months. If you need help with your implementation on v2, please feel free to reach out to us via Slack, we're happy to help.

[ArielGueta]

Great, thanks!