DEPRECATION NOTICE: please note that this parser is now deprecated, please use webapi-parser instead.
—-
This is a Java implementation of a RAML parser for versions 1.0 and 0.8. The parser depends on SnakeYaml, a Java YAML parser.
The old version that only support RAML 0.8 is still available here.
See http://raml.org for more information about RAML.
<dependency>
<groupId>org.raml</groupId>
<artifactId>raml-parser-2</artifactId>
<version>${raml-parser-version}</version>
</dependency>SNAPSHOT versions are NOT synchronized to Central. If you want to use a snapshot version you need to add the https://repository.mulesoft.org/nexus/content/repositories/snapshots/ repository to your pom.xml.
mvn clean package
mvn clean package -P jar-with-dependencies
Run standalone validator
java -jar raml-parser-2-{version}.jar raml-file ...
In order to provide more flexibility, users can set different system properties when parsing different RAML files. Here we list all the system properties you can use right now:
| Argument | Description | Default Value |
|---|---|---|
yagi.json_duplicate_keys_detection |
Setting it to true will make the parser fail if any JSON example contains duplicated keys | true |
raml.json_schema.fail_on_warning |
Setting it to true will make the parser fail if any example validated against a particular Json Schema throws a warning message | false |
yagi.date_only_four_digits_year_length_validation |
If TRUE, years of more than 4 digits are considered invalid | true |
org.raml.date_only_four_digits_year_length_validation |
Same as "yagi.date_only_four_digits_year_length_validation" (kept for backwards compatibility) | true |
org.raml.dates_rfc3339_validation |
if TRUE, enables RFC3339 validation for "datetime" type | true |
org.raml.dates_rfc2616_validation |
if TRUE, enables RFC2616 validation for "datetime" type | true |
raml.xml.expandExternalEntities |
Controls Java's EXTERNAL_GENERAL_ENTITIES_FEATURE and EXTERNAL_PARAMETER_ENTITIES_FEATURE | false |
raml.xml.expandInternalEntities |
Controls Java's DISALLOW_DOCTYPE_DECL_FEATURE | false |
org.raml.strict_booleans |
If FALSE, the strings "true" and "false" are valid for boolean type | false |
org.raml.fallback_datetime_to_datetime-only |
if TRUE, value passed to a datetime type will fallback on the datetime-only type and validate accordingly | false |
org.raml.cast_strings_as_numbers |
if TRUE, will attempt to cast strings as numbers and validate | false |
org.raml.nillable_types |
if TRUE, makes all types equivalent to type: type: type| nil; |
false |
raml.verifyRaml |
Verify the RAML file for YAML reference abuses | true |
raml.verifyReferenceCycle |
Specifically verify YAML reference cycles | true |
raml.maxDepth |
Limit depth of YAML references | 2000 |
raml.maxReferences |
Limit number of YAML references in expansions | 10000 |
raml.parser.encoding |
Defines the charset being used by the parser | UTF-8 |
The RAML parser's XML parsing components also respect Java XML entity properties.
RamlModelResult ramlModelResult = new RamlModelBuilder().buildApi(input);
if (ramlModelResult.hasErrors())
{
for (ValidationResult validationResult : ramlModelResult.getValidationResults())
{
System.out.println(validationResult.getMessage());
}
}
else
{
Api api = ramlModelResult.getApiV10();
}To contribute source code to this repository, please read our contributor's agreement, and then execute it by running this notebook and following the instructions: https://api-notebook.anypoint.mulesoft.com/notebooks/#380297ed0e474010ff43
We are always thrilled to receive pull requests, and do our best to process them as fast as possible. Not sure if that typo is worth a pull request? Do it! We will appreciate it.
If your pull request is not accepted on the first try, don't be discouraged! If there's a problem with the implementation, hopefully you received feedback on what to improve.
Any significant improvement should be documented as a GitHub issue before anybody starts working on it.
Please take a moment to check that an issue doesn't already exist documenting your bug report or improvement proposal. If it does, it never hurts to thumb up the original post or add "I have this problem too". This will help prioritize the most common problems and requests.
The maintainers will review your pull request and, if approved, will merge into the main repo. Commits get approval based on the conventions outlined in the previous section. For example, new features without additional tests will be not approved.
React
Typescript
Django
Laravel
Facebook
Microsoft
Google
Alibaba
D3
Tencent