[FEA] Support BioFormats library through cuCIM about cucim

[gigony]

Hi @JoOkuma ,

Thank you for your feedback!
We are also aware that supporting NGFF would be a future-proof feature to have and would like to focus on such formats after supporting major digital pathology formats (including .svs format). link.

I have created the issue to support Zarr format (#94), please give us your feedback.
Thank you!

[JoOkuma]

Hi Gigon,

There are also some effort within the python microscopy community to move towards zarr arrays for acessing large images.

It would be great to have a faster interface (maybe using pinned memory) to communicate with zarr arrays and their chunks.

Dask, Open Microscopy Environment (OME) and Napari already support it.

Let me know if this should be it's own issue or if it should directed to the cupy repository.

[joshmoore]

General 👍  and a few comments:

• The support level of python-bioformats (see this thread) would likely suggest using something else in the Python space
• @tlambert03 & co. recently undertook something of that nature. See https://forum.image.sc/t/aicsimageio-4-2-0-release/58150 but do note the GPL licensing of the underling libraries.
• Finally though the most immediate goal is always to get users their data as quickly as possible, there's a longer-term topic here that I wanted to raise: in the blog posts linked from #94 etc. the strategy we are trying to move the community towards is converting their data once to a long-term, open format and not trying to perform on-the-fly translation for every access. (Think of the CO₂ savings!) Help there welcome.

~Josh
  @ome